Screen shot of the FBI's Biometric Center of Excellence main web page. Photo credit:  BCOE / FBI.GOV

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is envisioning a future in which its agents would be able to use small handheld devices to collect fingerprints and photographs in the field and add them to a massive biometrics database.

If the Bureau gets its way, that future is not too far off — it has already taken major steps this year to make it a reality.

Most recently, the FBI is soliciting bids for the development of software that would enable agents to collect fingerprints and pictures of people they encounter. The prints and images could then be compared to the Bureau’s massive biometrics database.

As the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) points out, the plans seem to expand the FBI’s “RISC” program. RISC stands for Repository for Individuals of Special Concern. It allows field agents to compare the biometric information of suspects with the information on their database.

Ostensibly, this is part of the federal government’s fight against terrorism. However, like so many tools initially intended for that purpose, it looks as though RISC is also being expanded — even though the FBI told Congress that it would not do so.

In its Congressional testimony, the Bureau said it would only use “criminal mug shots” to populate its database and not photos from Facebook, CCTV cameras, etc. However, EFF believes that the new software will be used more broadly based on the solicitation for bids. In it, the FBI says it wants the handheld device to be able to send fingerprints and facial photographs to the database and receive a response as to whether there is a match.

As EFF points out:

“Photographs taken in the field are clearly not ‘mug shot photos’ because they’re taken before booking and possibly even before arrest. And it’s hard to see how a mobile tool that allows     officers to collect these non-mug shot photos and ‘submit’ them to a database is not also ‘populating the national repository.’ ”

EFF is one of the groups that called on the Department of Justice last year to state how it will “collect, use and protect” facial recognition data, but there has been no response. The many privacy concerns with the FBI operating a massive database of photos of Americans are obvious and the Bureau’s track record does not help assuage such concerns.

In a second major change, the FBI has consolidated civil and criminal fingerprints into a single database. With many employers demanding background checks, the fingerprints of many law-abiding Americans will soon be lumped into a database with those of criminals. Add to that the FBI’s big facial recognition plans and we are not far away from a future in which the Bureau maintains extensive files on millions of Americans that include fingerprints and photos. These files could arguably also contain information on the movement of citizens — for example, on the types of rallies they attend or where they go to church.

The EFF states:

“This is not OK. The government should not collect information on Americans for a non-criminal purpose and then use that same information for criminal purposes — in effect submitting the data of Americans with no ties to the criminal justice system to thousands of criminal searches every day. This violates our democratic ideals and our societal belief that we should not treat people as criminals until they are proven guilty.”

As is the case with many anti-terrorism and crime-fighting tools, the FBI’s recent efforts have the potential to do significantly more harm than good. Bottom line: it may be the Bureau’s job to keep an eye on things — but it seems equally crucial to freedom and privacy that we keep an eye on the Bureau.

(For reasons to be wary of this latest development, you may wish to read some of WhoWhatWhy’s earlier reporting on the Bureau’s activities: here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.)

Related front page panorama photo credit: Biometric camera (The U.S. Army / Flickr), Portable biometrics equipment (FBI.GOV), Mobile fingerprint identification (NEC Corporation of America / Flickr)

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
6 years ago

. . . . And so does every identity thief out there! At least the government is supposed to keep a record of what they are collecting. What I would like to see is personal access to those accumulated records and files without cost to the subject citizen! It would have to be the best compromise I can think of . . . . What about ya’ll?

NotAnymore 88
NotAnymore 88
6 years ago

Disney World and Universal Studios take your fingerprint to get in their theme parks.

Isn’t that insane?
And people do it blindly!

6 years ago

How can you trust the FBI? They couldn’t even get the people who killed JFK, or his brother Bobby. They really did a fine job of covering up the 9/11 ‘Crime of the Century’, seizing video evidence at and all around the Pentagon and refusing to release it to the public. They were heavy players in the Boston Bombing fiasco. Proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were being controlled by a higher power, even higher than the President, when the Opium just came pouring in from Afghanistan, right under their noses. How can you trust a off the hook, completely corrupt ‘police’ organization like that with anything? George Orwell is laughing in his grave at the stupidity of the American people. It’s time to tear down the ‘slums in DC’ and rebuild with honest materials. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. If you knew the whole back alley history of the FBI, you would vomit!

Freemen's Directorate
Freemen's Directorate
6 years ago

But look on the bright side; at least the OPM won’t be storing your data!

Subscribe to the Daily WhoWhatWhy

Relevant, in-depth journalism delivered to you.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.