Abrams Takes the Fight to Election Manipulators

Stacey Abrams, Fair Fight 2020
Stacey Abrams wants to be a voting rights superhero. Photo credit: DonkeyHotey / WhoWhatWhy (CC BY-SA 2.0) See complete attribution below.
Reading Time: 3 minutes

When Stacey Abrams “lost” Georgia’s 2018 gubernatorial election, a lot of Republicans were probably breathing sighs of relief. While the result was close, their strategy of rigging the state’s election laws to keep minorities from voting had paid off once again.

But that “victory” may turn out to be hollow. Yes, in the short run they denied Abrams the opportunity to become the country’s first female African American governor. In the process, however, they created a political force that could be the key in close races across the country in 2020.

After her narrow “defeat,” Abrams could have used her name recognition — and the widely held belief among her supporters that she was robbed of the governorship — to run for the Senate or even launch a long-shot bid to become the Democratic presidential nominee. Instead, she decided to fight for fair elections.

And that could pay dividends for Democrats up and down the ballot throughout the country — and even affect the presidential race in states where the result is expected to be particularly close.

Georgia’s gubernatorial election last year gave Abrams the motivation, the platform, and the experience to fight back. And that’s precisely what she is doing now — with the goal of allowing Democrats to compete on a more even footing in 2020 by reversing the effects of anti-democratic election laws passed by Republicans in states across the US.

Her group, Fair Fight, is launching an unprecedented effort to combat GOP voter suppression in 20 battleground states. In addition to spending millions of dollars on this project, Fair Fight will work with state parties and allied groups to raise the money necessary to make sure that eligible Americans can register to vote, actually cast a ballot, and have confidence that their vote is counted.

Nobody knows better than WhoWhatWhy that Abrams is the right person to spearhead such an effort. Loyal readers will recall that we sent three reporters to Georgia to cover her race because we believed that it would be ground zero for election shenanigans. Sadly, we were right.

In dozens of stories and videos, we documented how Republicans had put a thumb on the scales of democracy to make it more difficult for those people to vote who were most likely to support Democrats.

The result was that Brian Kemp — who had served as Georgia’s secretary of state for eight years and put in place many of these anti-democratic measures — edged out Abrams and became governor.

To get the outcome they desired, Republicans had to employ many of the tricks from their voter suppression playbook — purges of “inactive” voters, direct match voter registration, polling place closures, rejecting absentee ballots, making sure that some sites have long wait times, voting processes tailored to keep African American turnout low, and many more — which means that Abrams got a first-hand look at the obstacles that candidates face where the GOP controls the electoral process.

But her experience, her stature as a prominent victim of voter suppression, and the funding her group provides are not the only reasons why Fair Fight has a chance of succeeding.

In the past, only a handful of news outlets, including WhoWhatWhy, dedicated a significant share of their coverage to election integrity issues. However, thanks to Russian meddling in the 2016 election, the findings of the Mueller report, and increasingly aggressive Republican tactics to suppress the vote, concerns about the state of democracy in the US are going mainstream.

Major media outlets are finally recognizing how big a problem the attack on democracy is and how wide-ranging the consequences of not holding secure and fair elections are.

All of that — as well as the efforts of groups like the ACLU, Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, and many others to fight disenfranchisement — may just make a difference in 2020.

It would be true poetic justice, and the ultimate revenge, if the work Abrams and Fair Fight do over the next 15 months results in fairer elections, and prevents other candidates from being robbed as she was.


The cartoon above was created by DonkeyHotey for WhoWhatWhy from these images: Stacey Abrams caricature (DonkeyHotey / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), superhero (randychiu / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), whiteboard (Aul Rah / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), lock (Ivan Radic / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), floor (Decorative Concrete Kingdom / Flickr – CC BY 2.0).


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from StaceyAbrams.com and USDI.

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

2 responses to “Abrams Takes the Fight to Election Manipulators”

  1. Butch says:

    The entire system is captured still we pretend democracy exists. This Empire is a Plutocracy [corporatocracy] and until we accept that fact the egregious fascism that now permeates every aspect of our lives will continue unabated. It’s not the Emperor’s new clothes, it’s our collective belief in escalating false narratives and the silence of American humanity ensuring the facade continues. The government does EVERYTHING against the people, geez, wake up. You still think voting for one cheek versus the other of the corporate ass changes anything? It hasn’t for decades, but the beat goes on, denial of reality is what we excel at.

    • Jeff Clyburn says:

      is this the “both sides are equally bad” narrative of false equivalency being attempted? Please stop, because it won’t go well for you.
      All anyone needs to consider is the wild contrast in the voting records of the two sides. Not on outlier issues, but on the overall. Yes, it absolutely matters which side of the “corporate ass” people choose. (D) didn’t vote to destroy environmental regulations. That’s just one example among 5,000. Cut it out.