The November Voting Pool Just Got Bigger

Courts Slap Down Restrictive Voting Laws in Three States

Voting rights march
Reading Time: 2 minutes

While the attention of the media and the country was focused on the Democratic National Convention, courts in three states delivered major victories for democracy.

In North Carolina, a GOP-backed law ostensibly meant to combat voter fraud was rejected by a partially divided panel of federal judges. The decision said various voting restrictions “were enacted with racially discriminatory intent.”

“Although the new provisions target African Americans with almost surgical precision, they constitute inapt remedies for the problems assertedly justifying them and, in fact, impose cures for problems that did not exist,” the decision said.

Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Voting Rights Project hailed the ruling as a “stinging rebuke of the state’s attempt to undermine African-American voter participation, which had surged over the last decade.”

The decision invalidates a voter ID requirement while restoring provisions guaranteeing an extra week of early voting, same-day registration and preregistration.

“The Wisconsin experience demonstrates that a preoccupation with mostly phantom election fraud leads to real incidents of disenfranchisement, which undermine rather than enhance confidence in elections, particularly in minority communities,” the judge wrote in his decision.

In Kansas, Shawnee County District Judge Larry Hendricks rejected the state”s dual voter registration law and restored voting rights to 17,500 voters ahead of the state’s August 2 primary. The judge ruled in favor of the ACLU, which had objected to an attempt by Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach to prevent some voters eligible to vote in federal elections from casting their ballots in state and local elections.

WhoWhatWhy has extensively covered Kobach, who has called the ACLU “communists.” In each case, Kobach appeared to be on the side of restricting voter rights and opposing transparency.

“This ruling is a strong rebuke of Secretary Kobach’s efforts to obstruct voters,” said ACLU Voting Rights Project attorney Sophia Lakin. “It means that all qualified voters will now be permitted to vote for federal, state, and local offices without interference with their ballots.”

A third decision on Friday benefited voters in Wisconsin, where US District Judge James Peterson not only threw out the state’s voter ID law but also dealt a blow to the Republican argument that tough laws are needed to fight fraud.

“The Wisconsin experience demonstrates that a preoccupation with mostly phantom election fraud leads to real incidents of disenfranchisement, which undermine rather than enhance confidence in elections, particularly in minority communities,” the judge wrote in his decision.

These three rulings add to a string of victories for voting rights advocates. Earlier in July, a federal court struck down a Texas voter ID law saying that it was discriminatory. However, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s effort to restore the voting rights of 200,000 non-violent felons in Virginia was overturned.

All of the rulings show that the outcome of the 2016 election is already being contested in the courts. In particular the decisions handed down in Virginia and North Carolina could have a major impact on the presidential race, while the ruling in Wisconsin could help Democrat Russ Feingold regain his Senate seat, and hand control in the upper chamber back to his party.

Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from Voter Suppression (Chris Piascik / Flickr – CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) and flags of KS, NC and WI Flag (Wikimedia)

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


4 responses to “The November Voting Pool Just Got Bigger”

  1. MrLiberty says:

    But meanwhile, the countless ballot access laws, gerrymandering of districts, and presidential debate rules that are ALL designed specifically to protect the two-party oligarchy from any real competition, are completely legal. So if you love liberty, individual freedom, small government, sound money, property rights, etc. it is OK that YOU have nobody to vote for, but if you are about to cast your 6th ballot of the day for one of the globalist criminals that is running for office under the two-party banner, you shouldn’t have to produce ID to prevent the crime you are committing. Got it. You can always count on government to protect the interests of government over the people.

  2. JR Bob Dobbs says:

    Let’s put aside for a second the “extra week of early voting, same-day registration and preregistration”. Does anyone here disagree that one should be forced to show an ID in order to be allowed to vote? Without requiring ID, doesn’t it open the whole process to massive fraud?

    • Dacholiday Dach says:

      No you have your voter ID card, each person within a district is on a list, once you check in to vote, it is noted that you voted. No one else can vote again using your voter reg card. Even here in backwards South Carolina we did it like this until all the regressives starting hollering about fraud, when the country dared elect a black president.

    • MrLiberty says:

      When the candidates are hand selected by the ruling elite, paying attention to the voting process is completely missing the point…isn’t it? And when both major parties support ALL the same government programs and both major parties have made sure no competitors really have a chance, what is the point in worrying about who wins?