Some may take the Democrats’ House victory as a sign that all is well in the land — that the transfer of power in that body proves that elections work. But, complacency would be a deadly mistake.
I have lived and worked in places many Americans would consider “backwaters,” if not “backwards.” But I don’t ever recall seeing such incompetence and deliberately “accidental” mismanagement of a voting system as we just witnessed across this country.
We have all heard the horror stories, so I’ll just cite an egregious few out of many examples:
- Three Republican secretaries of state with histories of voter suppression oversaw their own races for governor — in Kansas, Ohio, and Georgia — amid claims of irregularities.
- In Westchester County, New York — where polling locations opened at 6 AM — voters had to cast ballots by affidavits for 2.5 hours because the wrong machines had been delivered to Briarcliff High School and Valhalla United Methodist Church. In New York City, nearly 100 percent humidity in all five boroughs made ballot scanners “uncomfortable” and caused ballot jams. Wet voters’ wet ballots also caused scanners to malfunction.
- In South Carolina, voting machines “flipped” voters’ selections as they cast ballots because the machines were not calibrated properly. In response, poll workers recalibrated the machines in the middle of Election Day — which can introduce all sorts of glitches into the system.
- In Gwinnett County, Georgia, missing power cords were the problem. The voting machines were running on batteries at one polling place, and when the batteries ran down, there was no way to power them up.
- In Johnson County, Indiana, a software issue prevented voters from casting ballots for five hours — and the Election Board president still refused to seek a court order extending voting hours
- In Dallas County, Texas, a voting system computer that shouldn’t have been connected to the internet turned out to have wifi connectivity and to be sending emails. This opens up the risk that the system could have been exposed to remote hacking.
- An October court ruling in Missouri allows residents to cast ballots with several forms of ID — but many poll workers did not know that ID requirements had changed, and refused to accept now-valid ID. St. Charles County even appeared to instruct poll workers to disregard the October ruling, holding onto the old requirement that Missourians must present photo ID to vote, leaving many people unable to cast ballots.
- In Detroit, voters were turned away from one polling location because election workers could not locate voting machines. The machines were later found on the other side of the polling site, a school, locked inside a closet that polling workers did not have access to.
- In Chandler, Arizona, the golf shop hosting one polling location was foreclosed overnight and voters had to travel to a different building — only to learn that the printers there were not working. One voter said he waited more than four hours to cast his ballot. Still other voters were turned away from empty buildings where they had been assigned to vote.
All told, it seems likely that millions of Americans experienced difficulties of varying degrees, as they sought to do their civic duty and exercise their right to vote. Many might not have had their votes counted, or had them counted incorrectly. Many others gave up and did not vote at all.
All this would be bad enough if these incidents could be chalked up as just accidents, poor planning, or incompetence. But we know that’s not the case. A lot of this is happening by design across the country, and it’s done by people in power who simply don’t want all Americans to participate in our democracy. Or who simply don’t care — or who cannot be counted on to competently administer the vote.
Clearly, this is nothing less than a national emergency. Because when democracy is threatened, our nation is threatened.
For years at WhoWhatWhy, we have been talking about what we call “election integrity,” holding accountable the process that is supposed to keep our election system equitable, functional, accessible — and secure. We started by concentrating on electronic voting, and noted that those systems are opaque and non-verifiable and just really dangerous.
When we first wrote about that, many in the establishment media considered it heresy, and we were ignored or labeled as “conspiracy theorists.”
Then came the 2016 presidential election and Donald Trump’s victory, and the media spun on a dime. Suddenly, it discovered all the experts with prestigious university credentials who could provide cover by conceding that, well, yes, electronic voting is a really bad idea.
Before long, as usual, the media moved on to other matters — the sort of lively, human-interest conflict stories that the public loves, that generate “eyeballs” and revenue. So we were kind of alone again on the election integrity beat. (If you want to learn just how nefarious electronic voting can potentially be, read this hair-raising ebook account of what might have occurred in Florida during that odd “hanging chads” debacle in 2000 that determined the 43rd presidency.)
A few months ago, we decided to tackle another serious election problem: targeted voter suppression. That’s the deliberate effort to make it more difficult — or impossible — for certain demographic groups to vote, helping ensure that one candidate prevails. This, too, has never been well-covered by the establishment media.
So tiny WhoWhatWhy committed resources we didn’t really have, and hired a bunch of folks in (or sent them into) several key states with expected close elections and a history of messy election days. And we reported and we reported. We published more than 50 articles, videos, and podcasts on this issue in the month leading up to the midterms.
As the election approached, and after we — and a few others, some on the case for years — had hammered it again and again, “voter suppression” was suddenly the rage, and in the last few days, virtually every news organization and every money-machine nonprofit was hawking their vote-suppression wares, and urging people to read and donate for the work they were doing.
We published many fine pieces, but it was a major exclusive two days before the election that finally busted through. Our several stories about hackable databases in Georgia earned us an unusual round of corporate-media coverage.
For a brief moment, everyone was our friend, was interested in what we had found. We’re pleased that the hard work of a small, nonprofit, commercial-free news outfit like ours could play a major role in waking America up to the crisis, even if only temporarily.
And it is likely to be only temporary, because when there is no horse race, no ticking clock, no sensational scandal unfolding, attention spans are short. There is nothing “exciting” about stories on how to fix these problems. Again, we will be told “no one cares” — and hence there is no time pressure for fixes, despite what is clearly a national threat, however quiet and insidious its operation.
Which is why, for WhoWhatWhy, our work has just begun.
Today is not the day after the election. It is the first day of the 2020 presidential election. And from this day forward, we will be investigating and reporting on the mess that is our elections system.
We hope others will join us now that the “moment” has passed, when the real work needs to be done. And can be done. And must be done.
Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from balloons (US Navy).
Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?
Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.
Our Comment Policy
Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.