JFK Records
Photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from National Archives / Wikimedia) and Justin Grimes / Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0).

The National Archives just released 19,045 JFK files. Today was the deadline for President Donald Trump to announce whether files previously either partially redacted or withheld from the public would remain hidden.

In a press release from this morning, NARA explained the process leading up to today:

As permitted by the JFK Act, agencies appealed to the President to continue postponement of certain information beyond October 26, 2017. The President provided agencies with a temporary certification until April 26, 2018 to allow for a re-review of all documents withheld in full or in part under section 5 of the JFK Act and directed agencies to “identify as much as possible that may be publicly disclosed” and to be “extremely circumspect in recommending any further postponement.”

According to NARA, 15,834 of the files still contain redactions. They also claim that 520 documents remain withheld in full from the public because they are not subject to disclosure, such as documents falling under the IRS code or a sealed court order. NARA clarified that the documents with remaining redactions would have another chance for disclosure in three years:

The President has determined that all information that remains withheld under section 5 must be reviewed again before October 26, 2021 to determine whether continued withholding from disclosure is necessary.

The White House also released a presidential memorandum stating the necessity for certain files to remain redacted:

Over the past 180 days, executive departments and agencies (agencies) have reviewed all of the information within records temporarily withheld from release and have proposed to the Archivist of the United States (Archivist) that certain information should continue to be redacted because of identifiable national security, law enforcement, and foreign affairs concerns. The Archivist has reviewed the information agencies proposed to withhold and believes the proposals are consistent with the standard of section 5(g)(2)(D) of the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 U.S.C. 2107 note) (the “Act”).

I agree with the Archivist’s recommendation that the continued withholdings are necessary to protect against identifiable harm to national security, law enforcement, or foreign affairs that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in immediate disclosure. I am also ordering agencies to re-review each of those redactions over the next 3 years.

Roger Stone, a friend and former political consultant to the president, who also wrote a book on JFK claiming that President Lyndon Johnson was responsible for a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, told WhoWhatWhy, “I am pleased that the president directed the final release of 19,045 documents today and that no document has been completely withheld. I am also pleased that the president ordered another review of withheld material by Oct 26, 2021 to determine whether further withholding can be justified. I have not yet had the opportunity to review how much of the material released today has been redacted but I am mindful that the president directed that redactions must relate to persons who are still living.”

The WhoWhatWhy team is currently reviewing the files, and will bring you the latest.

Updated 4/27/2018, 2:30 pm.

Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from JFK (National Archives), National Archives building (National Archives) and National Archives Logo (National Archives / Wikimedia).


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Will Donelson
Will Donelson
3 years ago

In Russ Baker’s book “Family of Secrets”, Russ goes into great detail about the whereabouts of G.H.W. Bush on 11/21/63 and 11/22/63 and the role Barbara Bush played in that episode. It is too long to go into in a comment, but I recommend everyone read the pertinent chapters in the book.

It makes for some real eye opening things about the secretive nature of G.H.W. Bush and how he has attempted to keep his ctivities of that time period out of the public eye.

We don’t know what role, if any, Bush played in the assassination, but there is enough in the public record to warrant many further questions about Bush.

Chad Nagle
Chad Nagle
3 years ago

Who among the “still living” is this craven presidential decision designed to protect? Cui bono? Only one person comes immediately to mind: George H. W. Bush.

Bush always said he couldn’t remember where he was at the time of the assassination. He must have been the only adult American at the time who couldn’t. Then researchers uncovered the fact that he was in Dallas, TX, that day. Oops!

When he was appointed Director of Central Intelligence in 1976, it was ostensibly to install a “fresh face” at the head of CIA, someone with no history as an Agency operative, a purely “political appointee” after a decade and a half of scandals and hearings. Then researchers turned up a 1963 memo from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover identifying “George Bush of the CIA.” Oops!

Whether GHWB was personally involved in the assassination, there is great reason to believe he knew – and still knows – something important about it that the public hasn’t heard. It is uncomfortable to think that Trump bowed to pressure from those protecting “Poppy” Bush, since Trump owes that family nothing. Meanwhile, the indelibility of the stain on the nation’s identity and consciousness caused by decades of Skull & Bones rule – and the murder of a head of state as a consequence – seems more and more likely. Shame.

Lawrence P. Schnapf
Lawrence P. Schnapf
3 years ago

It’s time to pressure the two Congressional committees with jurisdiction to hold oversight hearings on compliance with the law. If there are national security grounds for holding back parts of documents in 2018, what will happen in the intervening three years to change this conclusion?

3 years ago

The truth will never be revealed. Despite that most people already know enough of the truth to put the blame squarely where it belongs. An inside job coup.

Gary Severson
3 years ago

The SS trip records for the JFK, Sept 63 Conservation Tour were accidentally shredded according to what the SS told Judge John Tunheim in 1995. That response was given to Tunheim 2 weeks after his request that all 17 intell agencies turn over their records. The SS was the only agency to not comply. In fact, those file boxes, upon my examination in 2005 at NARA, each contained a single sheet of paper stating that those trip records had been “withdrawn for national security reasons”. That contradicts what the SS told Tunheim in 1995 when he requested the trip records & was told they were acidentally shredded. Which is it & are those trip records still being withheld/redacted?

Gary Severson
3 years ago
Reply to  Gary Severson

Considering Richard Case Nagell was privy to plans for an end of Sept 63 assassination attempt on JFK it seems these records are possibly sensitive as a foreign affairs/national security issue.

Subscribe to the Daily WhoWhatWhy

Relevant, in-depth journalism delivered to you.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.