123WhoWhatWhy has posted a link to the pdf of today’s court ruling on the NSA, here

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled today that the government’s bulk collection of phone data probably is unconstitutional, setting up an appeals court showdown about Fourth Amendment rights over the secrets revealed by leaker Edward Snowden.

Leon, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said that the National Security Agency’s metadata collection violates privacy rights, made a preliminary ruling in favor of five plaintiffs who challenged the practice.

His 68-page ruling included withering words for the federal government, describing the wholesale scooping of data as Orwellian.

“I cannot imagine a more ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘arbitrary invasion’ than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every citizen for purposes of querying and analyzing it without prior judicial approval,” he wrote. “Surely, such a program infringes on ‘that degree of privacy’ that the Founders enshrined in the Fourth Amendment.”

He said the government has not revealed a single instance where the data collection “has actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature.”

The former NSA contractor Edward Snowden praised the ruling in a statement released through journalist Glenn Greenwald:

“I acted on my belief that the N.S.A.’s mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge, and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts,” Snowden said. “Today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans’ rights. It is the first of many.”

Clearly, the NSA will stay on the front pages well into 2014. The link leads to Leon’s ruling. You can read it — and decide for yourself.

You can also get up to speed on other aspects of the attack on our privacy and constitutional rights, by rereading (or reading for the first time) some of the work WhoWhatWhy has been doing on these topics, such as this, this, this and this.

[box]WhoWhatWhy plans to continue doing this kind of groundbreaking original reporting. You can count on it. But can we count on you? We cannot do our work without your support.

Please click here to donate; it’s tax deductible. And it packs a punch.[/box]

Graphics:  hughillustration.com

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
6 years ago

Such a pity that we have to give up our rights to privacy and democratic freedoms just because we need to prove that we are not racist and islamonauseacs and import this alien and hostile culture that brings with it the pagan death cult practise of islamic unholy jihad. If it were not for these muslims the middle east and asia and further, would be thriving bastions of western civilisation and there would be no drain on the rest of us either. Just imagine all that money that gets siphoned off and diverted to jihad, all the money sent in aid to these islamic countries, and all the money we have to spend on securing our safety. If only we had some western leaders who could be courageous and honest and stand up and say no more trade or aid to islamic countries and say that we will do business and jihad on the unholy jihadists together. That is a real win win situation. Russia could also provide our oil and gas too. We won’t need these evil muslims and their oil. They declare war on us every day, it is time to change our ways towards them in particular in light of the fact that Saudi Arabia is implicated in 9/11.

7 years ago

Being as all the recent “terrorist” shootings have all been done by “lone wolves”, they wouldn’t have been caught by the NSA’s spynet. So the program(s) aren’t keeping us any more safe then before they began.

Subscribe to the Daily WhoWhatWhy

Relevant, in-depth journalism delivered to you.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.