JFK, records, National Archives
Photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from National Archives / Wikimedia and OpenClipart-Vectors / Pixabay.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) today released its sixth 2017 batch of records that may in some way relate to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The agency’s press release states that this latest cache includes 3,539 documents. It appears that 1,240 files are labeled “withheld-in-full,” meaning the public has never seen these documents before, and 2,259 labeled “withheld-in-part”, meaning they had previously been released to the public, but with some information blacked out. Yet another 439 files on their index give no indication at all of their status.

The documents from this release appear to originate from a mix of government agencies including the FBI, CIA, Army, NSA, and various congressional committees — although approximately 35 percent of the documents listed are not labeled in NARA’s index with an originating agency.

NARA stated that this would be the last release for the year:

At this point, with the exception of 86 record identification numbers where additional research is required by the National Archives and the other agencies, all documents subject to section 5 of the JFK Act have been released either in full or in part. Any information subject to section 5 of the Act, which has been redacted from documents in any of the six public releases this year, remains subject to further review by the agencies and the National Archives, in accordance with the President’s direction. The National Archives will release additional documents in 2018 based on the outcome of the reviews conducted pursuant to the President’s direction.

If you haven’t been keeping up with the drama surrounding JFK records release, by law all of the remaining JFK assassination records — those never seen before, and those previously released with redactions — were supposed to be released in unredacted form on October 26. The anticipation was high, and was fueled by tweets from President Trump announcing the release. But it didn’t happen that way.

Instead, the president granted the various agencies a six-month “re-review” period in which they could assure themselves no sensitive information would be revealed that needed to stay redacted for “purposes of national security.” The deadline for this re-review period is April 26, 2018.

Notwithstanding this hold-back, since October 26, NARA has released a total of five separate batches of JFK files to the public. But there’s a catch: Many of these files have not yet been “re-reviewed,” meaning that further redacted material could be unveiled. And that is the case with the files released today — both the “withheld-in-part” and “withheld-in-full” portions still contain redactions. Some files are more redacted than others (See our previous story on the November 3 release and the heavily blacked-out CIA file on David Sanchez Morales — considered by some experts a likely participant in any covert operation against Kennedy, if there was one.)

It remains to be seen what percentage of the redactions the various agencies will unredact by the April deadline.

Thus far, only a few of the documents have drawn keen interest — in part, perhaps, because of the unlikelihood that any “smoking gun” documents ever existed, or if they did, the likelihood they have already been removed from government files. Still, experts and aficionados expect to find “breadcrumbs” that, put together, can help paint a better picture of what did happen on November 22, 1963 in Dallas. Polls have consistently shown that the public doubts the conclusion of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, was responsible.

WhoWhatWhy’s research team has been diligently sifting through these documents since the first release, sorting and analyzing them to try and understand their significance. Stay tuned as we bring you the latest.

Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from JFK (National Archives), National Archives building (National Archives) and National Archives Logo (National Archives / Wikimedia).


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
frank Dietz
frank Dietz
3 years ago

In my opinion nothing should have been blocked (blacked out) if we had an honest investigation of JFK’s murder.

Jason BMW
Jason BMW
3 years ago
Reply to  frank Dietz

Exactly. Any redaction is criminal.

3 years ago
Reply to  frank Dietz

Yes. you’re right, but we’ve never had an honest investigation. Every single “investigation” has started with the premise that “Oswald”, and “Oswald” alone, shot the president.
Every “investigation” has been nothing more than propaganda to persuade the American public that “Oswald” did it.
However, even what little evidence has made it into the public arena disproved that premise long ago.

For example, the Warren Commission deliberately altered the death certificate completed in Dallas that located the president’s wound in his back.
Not his neck – his back.
The WC published an altered copy of the death certificate, one that omitted both the word “verified” and the signature of the president’s personal physician, George Burkley, in Dallas!
By erasing Burkley’s verification of (and indeed his very presence in history!) the wound’s location, the WC could then pretend that the doctors somehow mis-located the wound.

Predictably, the Warren Commission never called Burkley as a witness, even though he was believed to be the only person on the planet who was 1. riding in the motorcade, 2. present at Parkland Hospital in Dallas with the president, 3. flew with the body aboard Air Force One, and 4. attended the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital on Friday evening.

Why didn’t they want Burkley as a witness?
Because he would have insisted that the president was struck in the back, not the neck, and this would have destroyed the “lone-nut, no-conspiracy” solution that the Warren Commission was predetermined to find!

Iain McLennon
Iain McLennon
3 years ago

You have said it all, my friend. I was 11 when John Kennedy was murdered, and I have been a student of his death since the moment the Dallas Police apprehended the “lone assassin” a mere one hour after the event. There are only several relevant books on the assassination – all the rest begin with the premise that Oswald had something to do with it.

With regard to redaction of any documents pertaining to the assassination, there is NOTHING they could contain that would risk national security – they are redacted to protect the last living individuals who were a part of the conspiracy. Our government, specifically the CIA, killed JFK. There is nothing else to say on the subject. REGICIDE names names, dates, places, methods, previous attempt plans, everything coming from the personal papers of the architect of the assassination itself, the then-Deputy Director of the CIA.


[…] 3,539 more JFK assassination files released. “It appears that 1,240 files are labeled “withheld-in-full,” meaning the public has never seen these documents before, and 2,259 labeled “withheld-in-part”, meaning they had previously been released to the public, but with some information blacked out.”   https://whowhatwhy.org/2017/12/15/breaking-national-archives-releases-yet-another-3500-jfk-files/ […]

Subscribe to the Daily WhoWhatWhy

Relevant, in-depth journalism delivered to you.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.