U.S. District Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. (left) Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (right) Photo credit: U.S. District Court

The Boston media are furious at information being withheld about the Boston Marathon bombing. But wait — it isn’t what you think. No, they have not suddenly gotten curious about the sorts of inconsistencies, anomalies and outright lies that WhoWhatWhy has documented in approximately 80 articles now.

No, they just want access to jurors, presumably to tease out still more maudlin “human interest” stories rather than probe for the truth that appears to be hiding in plain sight.

What are they in a huff about? In yet another example of the unprecedented secrecy surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing prosecution, the presiding judge still hasn’t released the names of jurors three months on. This has raised the ire of at least two Boston area news outlets.

And in a parallel development, convicted Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s lawyers have uncovered evidence of “inflammatory images, headlines, and comments” on those same jurors’ social media feeds —  raising questions about their impartiality.

But the media pursuit of the still-unreleased juror names is not just a statement on what the extreme secrecy surrounding Tsarnaev’s prosecution means for oversight of our public institutions. It is also a statement on the establishment news media’s priorities.

Horrified By The Judge–But for the Wrong Reasons

Boston’s WBUR reported Tuesday that the US District Court trial judge, George O’Toole, has so far not responded to multiple motions filed jointly by the Boston Globe and WBUR requesting that the jurors’ names be released. So far, the jury list has already  been withheld for over 90 days.

Experts cited in media accounts were decidedly critical of the judge’s decision. Phrases like “unprecedented”; “an aberration”; “no possible rationale” — abounded.  The longest delay experts could remember for the release of names was 14 days, after jurors convicted the notorious Boston mobster Whitey Bulger.


And in a related matter, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s attorneys filed an appeal Monday on behalf of their client. They  alleged that the government did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt and reiterated their argument that the trial should have been moved out of Boston because of a public prejudiced against their client.

More than 12 pages of the appeal have been completely blacked out —  presumably because they contain personal information about the jurors.

Most notably, the motion also documents “the breadth and depth of inflammatory images, headlines, and comments that regularly passed through their [the jurors’] social media feeds,” Tsarnaev’s attorneys wrote.

In other words, Tsarnaev’s attorneys argue, that even if the jurors tried to adhere to the court’s admonitions to refrain from communicating about the trial, “the breadth and depth” of what they found on jurors’ social media feeds made that unlikely if not impossible. Because Tsarnaev’s attorneys only have access to “publicly-available” social media posts, there may be even more such “inflammatory” remarks in jurors’ feeds.

The appeal also cites several other factors as reasons to overturn the verdict and sentence and hold a new trial in a different venue.  These include leaks from law enforcement; the numerous memorial events held at subsequent marathons;  media coverage of victims and survivors and the circus surrounding Tsarnaev’s family’s visit to the United States to attend the trial.

Judge O’Toole has steadfastly refused to move the trial despite repeated attempts by the defense. He’s also ultimately responsible for releasing the names of jurors, but has so far taken the unprecedented step of delaying the release for months. Regardless of O’Toole motives, the decision has resulted in less scrutiny of the inner workings of justice.

There’s Gold in Them-There Jurors

It will be interesting to see exactly what approach The Globe and WBUR might take should they interview these jurors. Chances are, we’ll likely see a lot of front page “human interest” stories, but little scrutiny of the merits of Tsarnaev’s appeal.

After all, these are the same outlets who displayed a lack of curiosity about the many anomalies, inconsistencies, and outright falsehoods in the bombing investigation–yet are now in a tizzy because they have not been granted access to the former jurors.

We will inevitably hear emotional stories about the gravity of being on a death penalty jury and having to witness, front and center, all of the gruesome and heart-wrenching evidence.

But that won’t help us determine what’s behind all of the secrecy, including nearly 900 sealed court motions. And it certainly won’t answer the many lingering questions about the bombing and its aftermath, including how two novices were able to build and successfully detonate sophisticated and perfectly timed bombs at a public event swarming with anti-terrorism specialists. And it certainly won’t help us discern whether the machinery of justice is operating as advertised.

Will the establishment media, clamoring for the release of jurors’ names, have any interest whatsoever in the merits of Tsarnaev’s appeal? Will they question the jurors about their social media activities during the trial? Will they demand that Judge O’Toole unseal the hundreds of secret court motions that ultimately decided what was presented to jurors?  Not so likely.

Related front page panorama photo credit: WhoWhatWhy


0 responses to “Boston Media Suddenly Unhinged Over Marathon Trial”

  1. […] The judge in the case, George A. O’Toole Jr., ignited a veritable firestorm among Boston media when, three months after the conclusion of the trial, he continued to refuse to release the names of jurors. […]

  2. […] The judge in the case, George A. O’Toole Jr., ignited a veritable firestorm among Boston media when, three months after the conclusion of the trial, he continued to refuse to release the names of jurors. […]

  3. […] The judge in the case, George A. O’Toole Jr., ignited a veritable firestorm among Boston media when, three months after the conclusion of the trial, he continued to refuse to release the names of jurors. […]

  4. News info

    I was reading the news and I saw this really interesting information

  5. 海味批發 says:


    […]Every the moment inside a while we pick out blogs that we read. Listed below would be the most up-to-date web pages that we select […]

  6. Baker51A says:

    excellent article, thank you.

  7. (Comment by reader @iwasleah10years) Probably posted to FB by govt paid trolls on top of it all! “Hi, I am a govt paid troll working for the FBI. PLEASE ACCEPT MY FRIEND REQUEST…”

  8. @@iwasleah10years) Probably posted to FB by govt paid trolls on top of it all! “Hi, I am a govt paid troll working for the FBI. PLEASE ACCEPT MY FRIEND REQUEST…”

  9. (Comment from reader @rmives) Plenty of reasonable doubt for those who look

  10. Mark says:

    This article is right on. I don’t think its the popular media that worries the government about releasing the juror’s info — they couldn’t care less about the badgering the jury would suffer at the hands of these media outlets just to get their “human interest” stories. What worries the government is the so called amateur researchers who would use the juror information to uncover even more suspicious information about this case. I doubt the information will ever be known.

  11. PatGinSD says:

    Why the betrayal of their client on day 1 of the trial? Defenseless from day 1 of the trial, Dzhokhar was declared “guilty” by his own Defense Team despite his pleading Innocent on all counts. Now there’s a whiff of the American Justice system for you. An honest judge might even have ruled a mistrial at that point. But not Judge O’Toole (tool of the Prosecution=Government).

    • Tom Fontaine says:

      That’s what is done in a cover up event. The Defense works for the govt if they want to keep their lives and jobs.

    • Jas says:

      lol, she is a pro for them at this! She also represented the uni-bomber and the underwear bomber and I think another one. The prosecutor, the defense and the judge are all on the same side.

  12. Indi says:

    The oddest thing I read lately over the internet was that Judge OToole himself incited the defense team to ask for a change of venue…

    People can freely share and so easily multiplicate disinformation with a single click, because we indeed have over 900 sealed documents. It is an aberration.

    • Tom Fontaine says:

      Most of the disinfo is created by the feds cyber teams

    • Crime Reporter says:

      In McVeigh, the defense played a video of then Oklahoma Gov. Keating stating that McVeigh and Nichols were guilty, calling them “creeps,” and supporting their conviction. Not sure why the defense didn’t do something similar in this case. The Boston mayor, the Massachusetts government and even the US president and vice-president all convicted Tsarnaev in the media.

  13. Sniper Kitty says:

    “unprecedented”; “an aberration”; “no possible rationale” was pretty much applicable to the entire trial. Welcome to a small taste of ‘justice’ Boston style, Boston Globe and co….

  14. disqus_a2SRiKaB1i says:

    Boston media: Why not study the other characters at play at site 2? or take a closer look at why TOdashev has been silenced? Why the SAMS and isolation for a lone wolf?

Subscribe to the Daily WhoWhatWhy

Relevant, in-depth journalism delivered to you.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.