Mueller Is No Match for Trump’s Shamelessness and Indecency

Donald Trump, golf
Photo credit: DonkeyHotey / WhoWhatWhy (CC BY-SA 2.0) See complete attribution below.
Reading Time: 4 minutes

When President Donald Trump made up some testimony that never happened and a letter that did not exist to attack Robert Mueller on Thursday, he could be certain of one thing: The former special counsel was not going to retaliate. And that’s part of the problem when people with even a shred of integrity have to deal with this president.

Because Trump does not care about rules. He has no honor and no shame. Facts or truth don’t matter to him and he has no discernible ideals. For people who are not like that, going up against the president is like boxing with both hands tied behind their back.

Or playing golf against somebody who picks up his own ball and moves it to a better spot, kicks yours further from the flag, and lies about how many strokes he needs for any given hole.

Coincidentally, that is exactly how Trump plays golf.

The president is also one of the rare people who can’t be shamed into good behavior. A normal person, caught lying or cheating, will stop, at least temporarily. But not the US president. He’ll double down and, with the help of Fox News, convince a big chunk of the American public that wrong is right.

Trump’s feud with Mueller is a perfect example of why all of this is problematic. We’re using the word “feud” loosely because the president is the only one fighting. He is going for low blow after low blow while Mueller was simply trying to do his job.

It’s pretty obvious that the special counsel felt that the president is guilty of obstruction of justice and that he was deeply troubled by Russia’s interference on Trump’s behalf. But he can’t say that — because he feels that he is bound by a sense of duty and the rule of law. So Mueller went as far as he believed he could.

He even took the extraordinary step of holding a press conference to note that he was not allowed to make a determination as to whether Trump committed a crime. The special counsel did state, however, that:

“If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”

Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), the lone GOP lawmaker in Washington who is publicly backing the impeachment of Trump, was not the only one who felt that Mueller’s statement served as a call to Congress to deal with this president and his unlawful behavior in a way provided by the Founding Fathers.

For somebody like Mueller, holding that press conference was like him standing outside Congress with a megaphone and shouting: “What are you waiting for??? He did it!!! Pay attention and do something!!!”

With the help of Attorney General William Barr, Trump — who is not restrained by truth, duty, or honor — twisted the special counsel’s report and Mueller’s statement into “no collusion, no obstruction” (while also claiming that the report was totally biased against him).

Because most people didn’t read the report, its conclusions are now somehow in dispute — simply because the president, a serial liar, has a much larger megaphone, thanks to Fox News, talk radio, and Twitter.

And Mueller won’t respond, sadly. He has already stated that he does not want to testify before Congress because everything that needs to be said is in the report. While House Democrats, who would hold such a hearing, would certainly ask, it is virtually certain that Mueller would not answer questions like: “Is the president correct in saying that you cleared him of collusion?” His only response would likely be “Read the report” — and Trump would claim victory.

And it’s not just the special counsel.

Heads of state are loathe to take on Trump. They may give speeches that are clearly about the US president but they rarely mention him by name. It’s not (just) that they fear potential repercussions; for many national leaders, taking on the US president would play very well in countries where he is unpopular — which is most of them. Instead, they believe that diplomacy dictates they hold their punches — and so they play by the rules while the US president ignores them.

A perfect example was German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s commencement address at Harvard last week. In her speech, the de facto leader of the free world never spoke Trump’s name while slamming his ideology. But that’s simply not enough.

This is not just a problem for individuals. The media, paralyzed by Trump’s claim that any negative coverage of him is fake news, has been pulling its punches. While journalists should strive to be impartial in most cases, the perception of fairness shouldn’t prevent them from pointing out the obvious at every opportunity: that Trump has proved himself a liar and a crook.

The president is counting on all of them to practice decorum and not expose his obvious lies and corruption. So far it is working for him.

The cartoon above was created by DonkeyHotey for WhoWhatWhy from these images: Donald Trump caricature (DonkeyHotey / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), body (Steve Jurvetson / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), golf partner (Bill Wilson / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), and golf course (Dan Perry / Flickr – CC BY 2.0).

Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from The White House / Flickr, George W. Bush Whitehouse Archives and jackmac34 / Pixabay.

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


15 responses to “Mueller Is No Match for Trump’s Shamelessness and Indecency”

  1. Geoff Botting says:

    This website and its head staff should be ashamed. Censorship here is blatant and unethical. Lift your game!

    • Jeff Clyburn says:

      Pretty sure that red-flagging a contributor who has promoted a Hitler book here and blamed the Jews for interfering in the Mueller report is, in fact, “lifting” their game.

      Why would you think that works here? It’s pretty simple on most sites: Consistent and baseless hints suggesting that “Jews” are behind every problem in the world will get you banned after a while. You’re kinda lucky so far.

  2. Geoff Botting says:

    Still waiting?

  3. Dan says:

    Great article, all true. Americans don’t know how to deal with Trump, Americans are too naive. He skirted the system, using the Internet Research Agency, and he probably will again.

  4. Larry Rochelle says:

    If the CIA killed JFK, RFK, MLK, and forced out Nixon and Carter and did not kill HW Bush, W Bush or Trump, we must conclude that the CIA likes what Trump is doing or he would be dead of a heart attack last year.

    • bob muraco says:

      He Bush RAN the CIA for probably a decade, that is why they did nothing to the Bush family…

  5. Allan says:

    Love your President just keeps on WINNING

  6. Veronica says:

    I feel that everybody is in a state of stupor not knowing what to do for the best. The problem right now is the Senate’s Republican majority that are simply too scared of their trumpie voters to go against them, and too willing to just put up with anything to get the judges they want ! Basically it seems if the Congress takes back its rightful powers, then I have to wonder what is the point of the President at all ? Nobody just wants to be a figurehead – that’s why every President tries to ‘do’ as much by himself as he can, else all he does is wait to make a confirming vote after the other 2 branches have fought it out ! Obviously what is happening now is not what was intended by the framers !!!

    • El says:

      The framers gave us an opportunity to replace presidents that weren’t serving the people’s needs every 4 years. That is our best response.

  7. Wm. Boyce says:

    Congress created the “Imperial Presidency” over many decades and now we reap what they’ve sown.

  8. Geoff Botting says:

    “Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short.”
    Ok, this article is full of inaccuracies and is journalistic rubbish.

    • Jeff Clyburn says:

      lol… cite an example, or admit you can’t

    • Geoff Botting says:

      The Mueller Report, have you read it…no collusion and no obstruction of justice, pretty simple.

    • Comments Editor says:

      ‘The Mueller Report, have you read it…no collusion and no obstruction of justice, pretty simple.’

      It would be constructive if you could point out exactly where in the report this conclusion appears, as it does not agree with those set out in Volume 2, p.182.

      ‘…we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct…if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’

      Further to this, Mueller did not have all the facts:
      ‘The investigation did not always yield admissible information or testimony, or a complete picture of the activities undertaken by subjects of the investigation. … while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gaps, the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report.’ (Volume 1, p.10)

      Comments Editor.

    • El says:

      I don’t see anything inaccurate in the article, although it does contain opinions. The main remedy given to us by the founding fathers for dealing with a despicable president is to vote them out in four years; that is the remedy we should focus on! REGISTER, CONTRIBUTE, VOTE!