Delusion or Deception: Team Trump’s Russia Lie

Jared Kushner
Photo credit: DonkeyHotey / WhoWhatWhy (CC BY-SA 2.0). See complete attribution below.
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Jared Kushner’s suggestion that Russian interference was limited to “buying some Facebook ads” is akin to claiming that all the US did in Vietnam was send some military equipment.

Even if it weren’t a blatant, easily disprovable lie, it would still not change the fact that a foreign power, using illegal means, sought to interfere in a US election on behalf of the candidate it felt would be more pliant to its strategic goals.

However, as we have known for a long time — and the Mueller report confirmed again — Kushner’s statement is completely false. The Facebook ads were the smallest part of Russia’s campaign in favor of Donald Trump.

The biggest (that we know of) was the hacking of Democratic email accounts and finding a way to feed that information to the US public in a drip-drip fashion. Thanks to the compliant WikiLeaks as well as the equally compliant corporate media, there were nearly daily front page stories about the not-really-all-that-salacious details of those emails from the Democratic convention onward.

In short, Vladimir Putin played American journalists like a fiddle.

It’s impossible to quantify the impact of Russia’s meddling. We simply don’t know, for example, how many supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) stayed home or voted for somebody else because of the (not really surprising) revelation that the Democratic National Committee wanted Hillary Clinton to win. Would these voters have made the difference in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Wisconsin? We will never find out.

The same is true for independents who felt that they could not choose between two bad candidates.

But it would be ridiculous to argue that not a single voter was swayed by the month-long, generally negative coverage of those emails. Not surprisingly, Trump and his cohorts are trying to make exactly that claim. In the coming months, you’ll hear it a lot.

The reason why he keeps saying that Russian interference made no difference is that there may not be an issue that the famously thin-skinned and vindictive US president feels more insecure about than the legitimacy of his election. And that’s saying something.

He is in complete denial that he got a huge assist from Putin, and that’s a real problem.

While the US government itself is guilty of interfering in elections abroad, sometimes in a way that was far more deadly than what Russia did, the president’s nonchalance about the fact that Putin’s regime massively helped him is still deeply troubling.

Because if the commander-in-chief does not even want to hear about election security, then how can this administration fight the problem which, according to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, is bigger than anybody thinks?

“The bottom line is, there was overwhelming evidence that Russian operatives hacked American computers and defrauded American citizens, and that is only the tip of the iceberg of a comprehensive Russian strategy to influence elections, promote social discord, and undermine America, just like they do in many other countries,” Rosenstein said Thursday.

Add to that the ham-handed attempts of Trump’s team to get Russian help in 2016, and the result is one certainty: Putin will do it again next year.

And why wouldn’t he? It’s as though somebody robbed a bank and, instead of being held to account, they are invited back. That’s not hyperbole. Just consider what Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s lawyer/confidante/surrogate, told CNN this week: There is “nothing wrong” with accepting information from the Russians (hint: It’s highly illegal).

While administration officials insist that they have made it more difficult for Putin’s regime to interfere in 2020, those claims ring hollow in light of the statements from Kushner and Giuliani — and Trump’s complete dismissal of the threat.


The cartoon above was created by DonkeyHotey for WhoWhatWhy from these images: Jared Kushner caricature (DonkeyHotey / Flickr – CC BY 2.0), body (Elvert Barnes / Flickr – CC BY-SA 2.0), scooter (Elvert Barnes / Flickr – CC BY-SA 2.0), and background (The White House / Wikimedia).


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from President of Russia (CC BY 3.0).

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

4 responses to “Delusion or Deception: Team Trump’s Russia Lie”

  1. ShirlB says:

    It would be much more interesting to revisit Billiary’s successful and proven operations to diss Bernie Sanders in the primaries while she was pulling down big bucks to perform for Goldman Sachs.

    Kudos to all of the previous commentators. I wonder if Russ reads what we write? If he did, the focus of this site might see a shift.

  2. Reads Incessantly says:

    I agree with the first 2 commenters. Not up to the standards of WhoWhatWhy. Former British Ambassador Craig Murray insists over and over that he knows the emails weren’t hacked. And I believe it was the mainstream media that delivered Trump to us. And I think they’re likely going to direct us toward another gag-me-with-a-spoon Democratic candidate, with their insistence on not giving some great candidates the time of day. I keep wondering where we might be if the MSM had given the much-matured Rand Paul the time of day, last time around, for instance. He would’ve been a helluva lot better than Trump. The DNC probably still has not bothered to asked why so many people can’t stand Hillary and why so many people think America is NOT great. If they don’t bother to ask those 2 questions, they will not regain the White House.

  3. leveymg says:

    “It’s impossible to quantify the impact of Russia’s meddling.” That’s the only thing we really know about the possible impact on the 2016 election. The rest of this article is mere speculation – a waste of this site’s bandwidth.

  4. Jon says:

    “The biggest (that we know of) was the hacking of Democratic email accounts and finding a way to feed that information to the US public in a drip-drip fashion. Thanks to the compliant WikiLeaks as well as the equally compliant corporate media, there were nearly daily front page stories about the not-really-all-that-salacious details of those emails from the Democratic convention onward.”

    “The bottom line is, there was overwhelming evidence that Russian operatives hacked American computers and defrauded American citizens”

    1/ The Russians hacking the DNC emails has yet to be proven. Therefore it is a theory and not a fact. I may be wrong but you might want to provide a link to the facts you derived this conclusion from.

    2/ The rigging of the DNC primary was “not really all that salacious”? And Donna Brazile’s hand-off of debate questions to Hillary?
    You have to be kidding.

    This article is simplistic and disappointing although it’s a good start for a spy novel.