Consumer Protection Czar’s Confession Exposes Banks’ Political Grip

Mick Mulvaney
Mick Mulvaney, Director of the Office of Management and Budget Incumbent and Interim Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Photo credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Reading Time: 2 minutes

A promise to “drain the swamp” won Donald Trump the hearts of blue-collar Americans — who delivered him the presidency expecting that he would defend them from elites. Trump himself has already done plenty to dash those hopes, but on Tuesday Mick Mulvaney, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and interim head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), provided perhaps the clearest indication that those who are supposed to drain the swamp are actually some of the worst offenders.

In an admission that shows either ineptitude or brazen indifference, Mulvaney told a group of banking executives that lobbyists who donated to his campaign had a higher chance of getting their legislation heard and approved. Those who didn’t contribute didn’t even get to see him because, he explained, “We had a hierarchy in my office in Congress.”

Wall Street moguls remain the most generous patrons of Trump’s party. The FIRE (finance, insurance, and real estate) sector contributed more than $200 million to the two leading parties this election cycle, with 57 percent going to Republicans. Since 2010, payday lenders have funneled more than $13 million to members of Congress — most of it ending up in Republicans’ pockets. The securities and investment industry sent Mulvaney more than $100,000 in 2015-16, when he represented South Carolina in the House.

The Obama administration created the CFPB in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to enforce transparency and accountability from banks and financial institutions, and to protect consumers from predatory lenders. From the beginning the agency’s expansive powers and independence has unnerved corporate executives and, in turn, the GOP.

Related: Mulvaney Tries to Make Consumer Watchdog Disappear: Will His Magic Act Work?

Mulvaney has vehemently criticized the CFPB in the past, calling it “extraordinarily frightening” and a “sick, sad” joke. Since joining the bureau last November he has dropped a lawsuit against a group of lenders that allegedly imposed interest rates as high as 950 percent. An inquiry on the massive data breach at Equifax has languished. And the public may soon lose access to the agency’s popular complaints database, which stores feedback from consumers who had sub par experiences with particular banks. As if this weren’t enough, Mulvaney requested not one cent in the year’s first quarterly funding request to the Federal Reserve.

Watch the videos below to learn about how Mulvaney’s leadership of the CFPB could affect consumers.



Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from Mick Mulvaney (Gage Skidmore / Flickr – CC BY-SA 2.0).

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

3 responses to “Consumer Protection Czar’s Confession Exposes Banks’ Political Grip”

  1. JOE says:

    REALIST – No the US economy is not more sound with the Fed, that is simply inaccurate. The Fed and the graduated income tax both came into existence near the same time, both have served to destroy the dollar and steal wealth from our citizens. We do need regulatory oversight, that is quite true; however, the Fed has nothing to do with this. Ending the Fed would be a great step to fiscal responsibility for our government, unfortunately I do not see that happening in the near future…

  2. John says:

    Seems this government bureau is being abused and serves as nothing more than a false sense of security for consumers. Consumers take some accountability in your lives, read the fine print and take financial decisions seriously. Audit and end the Fed so savers can get decent interest rates again leading to safer investment. Abolish this and many other federal bureaus/departments. The creation of these almost always serves special interests even more so than before their creation. The revolving door is a symptom of government and will always corrupt even the best of intentions over time.

    • A realist says:

      You obviously have no idea what interest rates were when the Fed did not exist……try mid 20% range. Go pick up a history book. One thing is for sure – the US economy is more sound with the Fed than it was without one.
      The point of a government is to PROTECT its citizens, whether it’s from abroad or subjugation at home by predatory companies. The US was not a great place economically when child labor, zero work protections, zero food safety protection reigned supreme. If you want to live like that consider Somalia or another 3rd world country were lawlessness prevails and citizens have zero protections from being enslaved.