The Granddaddy of Campus Mass Shootings

Powerfully Retold 50 Years Later: The Story of the UT Campus Shooter

University of Texas Tower
University of Texas Tower from which gunman Charles Whitman fired.  Photo credit:  Wally Gobetz / Flickr
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Texas is famous for its love affair with guns. Elected officials in the Lone Star State can’t move quickly enough, it seems, to equip everyone who is not a toddler or a recognized mass murderer with firearms.

Enter the new Texas-centered documentary Tower.

It’s a spell-binding recreation of an extraordinary event: that day in 1966 when someone ascended to the top of the clock tower at the University of Texas in Austin, and began firing a rifle at anything and everything. The siege continued for an astonishing 96 minutes. It was the first campus mass shooting.

By the time the gunman, Charles Whitman, a former marine sharpshooter turned architectural engineering student —  with an arsenal, including a 6 mm Remington rifle with a telescopic sight, an M1 semi-automatic carbine, and several handguns — was finally killed, the toll was 16 dead and three dozen wounded. The siege traumatized the nation — back before this kind of pointless carnage became so common.

I saw Tower, appropriately, in Austin — during the South by Southwest (SXSW) film festival. It was interesting to see it in the state capitol, and one of the most liberal, tolerant places in Texas — ironically, perhaps the place where one might normally feel the least threatened by firearms.

The film, which won SXSW’s audience award for Feature Documentary, itself is a feat of innovation. It is a dramatic reconstruction, a mix of archival footage, voice-overs from present-day interviews with the survivors and “rotoscopic” animation.

This kind of thing has perhaps never been done before — at least I have never seen a film rendered quite this way — and both the story and the technique are riveting. It moves relentlessly from the first shot until the gunman is subdued, then continues into interviews and recollections, bringing us up to date with some of those whose lives intersected on that extraordinary day.

Whitman Shell Casing Display

Related frontpage panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from University of Texas Tower Wally Gobetz / Flickr Whitman’s 6 mm shell casing recovered after the shooting.  Photo credit: David / Flickr

What stands out the most for me are the personal accounts of paralyzing fear and self-described cowardice, as well as astonishing heroism. In particular, the story of one woman, Claire Wilson, who lost both her boyfriend and her unborn child that day. And the woman who ran out to comfort her, risking her own life as the gunman continued relentlessly.

And Allen Crum, university bookstore manager and Air Force tail gunner, who had never fired a weapon, but, nonetheless, heroically mounted the tower carrying an old rifle, joined by a couple of poorly-equipped Austin police officers.

Although the film wisely stays rigorously on its narrative course, no viewer can avoid musing about where we are, half a century hence, as a society. Presumably, though, we will break along predictable lines. Some will wonder whether Whitman could have somehow been picked off earlier if more citizens were armed. Others will worry about the proliferation of guns on campus. And that is a timely subject, proving once again that past is prologue.

This coming August 1st is a kind of double whammy: it’s the 50th anniversary of the Tower bloodbath, for which the university, very belatedly, will be unveiling a monument.

Amazingly, that is also the day a Texas law goes into effect allowing licensed individuals to carry concealed weapons on campuses. As many as 500 UT students are expected to be able to attend classes, packing heat.

That development has plunged the university into recriminations and protests, and at least two faculty members, worried about their own safety, have resigned.

What, one wonders, have we learned over these 50 years? And where is it all headed?

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


One response to “The Granddaddy of Campus Mass Shootings”

  1. News Nag says:

    I’ve seen only the trailer, so this thought is premature and probably too assuming. While I can appreciate that the creative blending of filmic elements, including rotoscopic, could be compelling or at least interesting, my opinion is that the mentality of most Americans is already too cartoonish and that further cartoonization doesn’t add anything of substance to the story or to any possibility of ‘learning’ from the event or the narrative. Last thought about it is that cartoonizing, at least in the blandness of this film trailer’s ‘graphics’, softens the effect of the events and overall makes the film as much about itself as it does about the story, which IF so would suck — on the other hand, it would make the film sooo very Austin.

    A parallel thought is that graphic novels are full-immersion experiences that pull you deeply and consistently into the story and subject matter. The rotoscopic pieces seen in the trailer feel unnecessary and shallow, belonging more to a genre that includes Rick Linklater’s “Waking Life”, an entertaining (until bordeom sets in; your mileage will vary) trip through small old complacent Austin. Still, like I said, I haven’t seen the full documentary. And Austin still is complacent for the most part, BTW.