Does Our Entire Criminal Justice System Need “Creative Destruction”?

Reading Time: 1 minute

We are told, almost from childhood, that we have a legal system, and a government of laws — and not of men. But it is a system created and controlled by man, and is subject to the biases, deceptions, frailties, and inherent motivations of man.

Yet, from such a system, we often dispense the most draconian of punishments in the name of justice.

At a time when even members of the Supreme Court of the United States talk of the Founders’ intent, and of originalism — defined as “a principle of interpretation that views the Constitution’s meaning as fixed as of the time of enactment” — a whole body of modern scientific evidence suggests that we need to be looking at our criminal justice system in entirely new ways.

Law Professor Adam Benforado is worth listening to when he argues to WhoWhatWhy’s Jeff Schechtman that we essentially need to bring “creative destruction” to one of the very foundations of a free society. He outlines the problem and his plans in his book Unfair: The New Science of Criminal Injustice.

Related front page panorama photo credit: Arrest (Elvert Barnes / Flickr), Prison (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Court (Cannabis Defense Coalition / Flickr)

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

2 responses to “Does Our Entire Criminal Justice System Need “Creative Destruction”?”

  1. Title

    […]The information mentioned within the article are some of the ideal offered […]

  2. lofty1 says:

    Adam Benforado is onto it here. Investing in prevention is the key. Just as it is for the diseases of the body, prevention of the many causes is the answer to the inequities or “dis eases” of the justice system.