Saturday Hashtag: #InfluenceLinchpin

Listen To This Story

What happens when a system concentrates wealth beyond the reach of ordinary wage earners and converts that wealth into political control?

Wealth translates into political power, allowing the system to protect itself. But when a system protects wealth at the expense of the public good, it begins consuming the economic foundations on which its own survival depends.

Income Definitions

The current system deliberately classifies labor earnings (wages and salaries) and asset earnings (assets, interest, dividends, rentals, and capital gains) as fundamentally different, even though both represent means of generating economic power.

Economically, earnings are not merely money received. They represent economic force: the ability to command goods, services, assets, and influence.

In 2025, wages and salaries made up 49.8 percent (page 32) of US personal income, while asset income — interest, dividends, and rent — comprised 20.3 percent (page 11). Among the top 1 percent, however, nonwage income accounted for approximately 66 percent of adjusted gross income.

The preferential treatment of asset earnings was not inherent in the original 1913 US income-tax law; that developed later. 

Income vs. Asset Earnings

Most wealthy US households’ earnings come from investments and businesses, not wage earnings. 

Elon Musk, for example, did not take a salary from Tesla in 2025; his wealth comes from ownership and equity.

Donald Trump also demonstrated the insignificance of a standard salary, making headlines by falsely claiming he was the only president to give his away.

These examples illustrate the distinction between compensation for work and wealth generated through ownership. 

For members of this group, salary represents only a small fraction of their economic power because business holdings, investments, and appreciating assets generate substantially greater wealth without any labor.

Economic Power

If an asset appreciates by $100 million, its owner’s economic power and tax liability do not increase by $100 million.

But if they borrow $10 million against that wealth without selling the asset, they gain $10 million in tax-free economic power without triggering taxation on the underlying wealth.

The legal classification is a loan. But the underlying reality is that their untaxed wealth has generated additional untaxed economic power. The loan does create a liability, but modern financial leverage tools reduce the liability’s economic burden, while increasing the economic power it generates.

Earning Designations

The system creates different and artificial legal boundaries for economic earnings designed to perpetuate the system’s inequity.

Labor earnings are generally taxed as income. Much of the economic power generated by assets accumulates untaxed until “realized” (sold for a profit) — which borrowing circumvents — and even then, preferential treatment still applies.

These distinctions determine which forms of economic power are taxed as they are earned and which can accumulate beyond the reach of tax accountability. By privileging asset-based wealth over labor earnings, the system reinforces the economic inequality embedded in its own design.

Tax Revenue and Economic Power 

The protection of asset wealth from taxation does not simply preserve private wealth — it removes tax revenue from the public sphere.

In 2025, this was part of more than $2 trillion in forgone tax resources that could otherwise generate tangible economic benefits for the public.

This system increases asset-based economic power while decreasing wage-earning power, which has been losing value since 1973.

The consequence is not only a growing concentration of wealth but a redistribution of economic power away from wage-earner households, while diminishing the public resources on which they depend. 

That concentration of wealth and economic power sets the stage for a deeper structural problem: Those who benefit most from the system also control the laws that govern it.

Influence and Regulatory Capture

When lawmakers trade and profit from the markets they are supposed to regulate, it further complicates and distorts the power dynamics in this system. 

Through this lens, a clear legislative conspiracy comes into view: Wealthy interests pool resources to influence the legislators who write the laws governing markets and the tax code, designating which earnings thrive and which stagnate.

These actions raise serious questions under the conspiracy provisions and legal intent of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). 

This influence extends beyond lawmakers to funding political campaigns and manufacturing social movements that manipulate public opinion, manufacture opposition, and block beneficial public policies that threaten entrenched financial interests.

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision institutionalized the role of outside political spending, which also enabled the industrial-scale production of engineered public opposition (pages 5, 8, and 18).

This often takes the form of astroturfing, which manufactures the illusion of organic grassroots dissent, concealing the massive financial interests behind the scenes.

The Tea Party illustrates this perfectly. After the 2008 financial crisis, the Koch brothers — backed Americans for Prosperity — organized and funded Tea Party activism, amplifying a fractional public discontent into a media firestorm.

The same sleight-of-hand ploy has conjured a threat from mythological voter fraud — rarer than a lightning strike to the head — to justify the construction of a lightning-proof voting dome over the entire nation, to protect every American from a one-in-a-million celestial skull bolt.

The Collapse of Equivalent Purchasing Power

As wealth concentrates, money loses its equivalence: The same dollar represents radically different levels of economic security, opportunity, and purchasing power, depending on who holds it. Consequently, 1 in 3 Americans have no emergency savings, and 29 percent can’t afford an unexpected expense over $400.

A million dollars means something very different to a wage worker than to a billionaire. For a worker, it represents a lifetime of accumulated earnings; for a billionaire, it is a fraction of their investment portfolio.

When money no longer carries equivalent economic weight across society, its distorted purchasing power directly translates into unequal political power. 

Political Power Ecosystem

The wage earner has been priced out of political power because, within this system, the same dollar carries exponentially greater political power and efficiency for the wealthy than for workers.

This system, fractured by the ideological fantasy of unregulated capitalism, has given the same currency dramatically different political power, depending on who wields it.

The consequences are not merely theoretical. 

The 2014 study “Testing Theories of American Politics” examined 1,779 policy issues over 21 years and found that aligned wealthy interests had substantially greater control over legislative policy outcomes than ordinary citizens.

The result is a political system in which economic inequality becomes political inequality, which in turn preserves the economic structures that produced it.

From Politics to Consumer Cost

But politics is not the endpoint. Asset wealth continues to outpace wages in generating economic power while remaining shielded from taxation, as perpetually rising prices steadily erode wage earners’ ability to afford basic necessities.

When labor-based households spend everything on essentials, it becomes impossible to build financial security. 

The economic power accumulated at the top is thus accompanied by a growing loss of economic freedom at the bottom. 

Existential Flaw

The system is not simply producing a richer class and a poorer class.

It has created two fundamentally different mechanisms for generating economic power, one constrained by taxation and the other amplified by preferential treatment.

The political economy has already demonstrated the democracy-ending consequence.

The evidence reveals a total collapse of democratic responsiveness and a profound imbalance of political power, even as elections and constitutional institutions remain in place.

The consumer economy is where that process becomes existential, as average wage-based households are forced to spend everything just to survive.

And that is why the legal distinction between wage earnings and asset earnings is not merely a technical matter of tax terminology.

The legal definition of income determines which forms of economic power taxation impede and which can accumulate beyond its reach.

When accumulated wealth finances most of political influence, and political influence protects all the rules governing accumulated wealth, the voting public becomes the weakest participant in its own government.

Hashtag Picks

Secret Documents Reveal Donors Behind $330 Million for Trump’s Ballroom

From The Washington Post: “A list obtained by The Washington Post reveals all the major donors to President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, including previously undisclosed contributors who have benefited from regulatory decisions, government contracts and, in one case, a pardon for a family member.” 

Millions of Dollars in Secret Spending Could Upend the 2026 Midterms

From The New York Times: “A New York Times review of advertising data, campaign-finance filings and tax records revealed that about $1 billion in anonymous money is sloshing through the political landscape in 2026, a staggering sum and yet almost certainly a low-end estimate, given how difficult this money is to trace.” 

Many Super PACs in the 2026 Election Cycle Are Supported by a Single Wealthy Donor

From Public Citizen: “More than 100 super PACs that raised at least $1 million during the 2026 election cycle thus far have received the majority of their funding from a single donor. Together, these super PACs raised more than $1 billion, with $913 million coming from donors who supplied the majority of their funding, according to a new analysis by Public Citizen.” 

Failure of Clarity Act Turns Crypto Industry Focus to Federal Regulators

The author writes, “The Clarity Act’s failure to progress through Congress leaves regulation of the cryptocurrency industry to government agencies and vulnerable to interpretation as administrations change, analysts said, another potential stumbling block to wider adoption.” 

Explore Financial Disclosures From President Trump and 1,600 of His Appointees

From ProPublica: “Use this database to explore potential conflicts of interest for President Donald Trump and his team. The documents disclose positions officials have held outside government, their assets and their debts, among other things.”

CNBC and SurveyMonkey Quarterly Money Survey: Affordability (July 2026)

From CNBC and SurveyMonkey: “Half of Americans (53%) are more stressed about their finances now compared to one year ago. This financial stress is fueled primarily by a lack of savings (45%), credit card debt (30%), auto insurance costs (25%), and medical bills (23%). This anxiety is compounded by economic pessimism: 50% believe that the U.S. economy will worsen over the next year due to the rising cost of living (79%), government policy (68%), and international turmoil (62%).”

The American Affordability Tracker 

The author writes, “Americans are struggling to afford essentials like food, child care, housing, and energy. And many don’t expect their situation to improve. Policymakers and community leaders need clear, timely data to understand how rising costs affect people in their communities and where pressures are most acute. This tracker brings together the latest available data on earnings, household costs, and financial strain to provide a clear picture of affordability across the country.”

It’s Good to Be a Billionaire, Even at Tax Time

The author writes, “Scores of people with enormous wealth are paying relatively little, if anything, in taxes. Billionaires — and those with fortunes that are merely in the hundreds of millions — can avoid taxes legally, using loopholes that are unavailable to the rest of us. The income tax is for working people. So is the payroll tax — which wage earners and their employers pay into Social Security and Medicare, week after week. The payroll tax and the income tax corral nearly everybody who holds down a job. Then there is the superrich.”