Three Wisconsin counties with huge, unexpected shifts to Trump are not hand-counting some or all of their paper ballots — though they could if they wanted.

Three Wisconsin counties — with highly unexpected surges of votes to Donald Trump — have decided not to hand count their paper ballots when they have an option to machine-scan them. This could prove consequential in a state where just 22,177 votes separate the candidates.

The decisions of election officials shut the door on actually being able to conclusively explain the large discrepancy in the votes between 2012 and 2016 and to assure voters that the count was accurate.

The counties are:

Outagamie (biggest city: Appleton)

Average margin of victory, last four presidential elections: 1,639 votes, GOP

This year: 13,480 GOP

Gain beyond average for GOP: 11,841

Brown (biggest city: Green Bay — home of the Packers)

Average margin of victory, last four presidential elections: 2,074 GOP

This year: 13,804 GOP

Gain beyond average for GOP: 11,760

Rock (biggest city: Janesville)

Average margin of victory, last four presidential elections: 17,080, DEM

This year: 7,845, DEM

Gain beyond average for GOP: 9,235

In an interview with WhoWhatWhy, Outagamie deputy county clerk Sara Hickey explained that Outagamie, like many other counties, has a complicated mix of voting technology types. These include paper ballots counted by hand, paper ballots fed into optical scanners, and touch screen electronic voting.

She said that the Board of Canvassers, made up of the County Clerk plus one representative of the Democratic and Republican parties, had voted not to allow a hand count of optical scan paper ballots where they could be fed through scanners.

“We decided not to hand count because machines are much more accurate than people,” she said. Thus, the paper ballots will be fed back through scanners.

Will the optical scans read the ballots differently this time? That seems highly unlikely, so we will never know whether those machines recorded votes accurately.

As for the touch screen machines, they too will almost certainly return the exact same result — and there is no way to discover whether those machines misrecorded votes.

Hickey said she did not know how many or what percentage of the ballots were of each type.

The bottom line is that only a limited percentage of ballots will be examined by hand — and those are the only ones that could possibly alter the outcome.

Such factors severely limit the likelihood of reversing the outcome from November 8 — though that always remains possible until the process concludes.

(source for margins: Jud Lounsbury)

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TempestVTeapot
TempestVTeapot
4 years ago

The number I think that would be most telling is: How do these gains compare with the rest of the state? In other words, is there a high correlation between non hand recounted districts, and significant gains for the GOP compared with previous years?

From Our Twitter Page
4 years ago

(Comment by reader @SS102016) @BradSchimel What are your counties hiding? This is only to verify the vote and they have shown discrepancies. What are you doing about this ?

Jack Hughes
Jack Hughes
4 years ago

The more determined Republicans are to prevent independent verification of those ballots, the more obvious — and urgent — the need to do so..

Virginia Martin
Virginia Martin
4 years ago

So “machines are much more accurate than people.” Except when they’re wrong. It’s not that hard to hand-count paper ballots. It doesn’t take that long. It doesn’t cost that much. We just hand-counted 27,000-plus ballots (75% turnout) in Columbia County, NY. Was their turnout that high? If we can do it, they can.

Matt
Matt
4 years ago

“So ‘machines are much more accurate than people.’ Except when they’re wrong.”

Exactly. Do the citizens of Outagamie county not realize how easy it is for one crook to make sure their machines count wrong?

Ken
Ken
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Voter machine memory cards can be tampered with, or the data collection software can also be tampered with a stealthed exploit. As the HBO documentary “Hacking Democracy” showed it was possible back then (2005), and would still be able to take place today.

Subscribe to the Daily WhoWhatWhy

Relevant, in-depth journalism delivered to you.
Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.