Is Trump’s Dam Breaking?

Rudy Giuliani, Lev Parnas
Trump’s A-Team: Soviet-born businessman Lev Parnas, left, and personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, right, in 2018. Parnas, who served as Giuliani’s fixer in Ukraine, made damaging public statements about Trump’s role in the Ukraine affair on Wednesday. Photo credit: © Alex Edelman/ZUMA Wire
Reading Time: 2 minutes

It’s a small thing that may not get a huge amount of attention, but it seems significant. 

A writer for an iconic, conservative news and opinion publication has leveled a new charge at Trump, based on revelations over the Ukraine affair and the role of operative Lev Parnas.

Writing today in the National Review, under the headline “What Kind of President Trusts Two Shady Ukrainians from South Florida?”, senior political correspondent Jim Geraghty surveys the trainwreck and asks: 

Could even the most ardent fans of President Trump concede that he is constantly hiring the wrong people and listening to the wrong people?

He then totes up the remarkable antics of Parnas and his sidekick Igor Fruman, in concert with Rudy Giuliani and, of course, Trump himself. 

You would like to think that even if the president of the United States decided to go through with a back-channel inquiry to the Ukrainian government to see if he could get them to investigate the Bidens, he would take one look at Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman and say, “Whoa, whoa, whoa. These guys look like the most oafish henchmen since Jeff Gillooly and Shawn Eckardt went after Nancy Kerrigan. You wouldn’t trust these guys to pick up a take-out lunch order, much less use them to execute a secret and politically sensitive request of a foreign government.” [Bold face added for emphasis.]

Geraghty then concludes:

Democrats are going to push for impeachment, contending the inquiry into Hunter Biden was improper and a partisan witch hunt, that Trump jeopardized the security of Ukraine, and that he stretched executive privilege beyond all recognition by refusing to cooperate with any of the House’s inquiries.

They’re overlooking a much simpler and more persuasive argument. A president who entrusts sensitive duties to the likes of Parnas and Fruman is incapable of recognizing when someone is trying to con him — even an amateur and buffoonish attempt to fool him. And that’s a really dangerous person to have in the Oval Office. [Bold face added for emphasis]

So, there it is: Forget everything else about Trump. The lies. The self-serving behavior. The disastrous policies. 

Here we see just how poor his judgment is. And that’s one thing there is no recovering from. 

Once GOP mainstays like the National Review get really, deeply, publicly worried, well… there just isn’t going to be enough of a base to sustain Trump in November.

It also is a warning shot across the bow of Republican senators planning to quickly acquit the president. 

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

5 responses to “Is Trump’s Dam Breaking?”

  1. David Lawrence XVII says:

    I like your logic :) I have a picture of me at a party where Stalone is also there (from the 90’s like the party Parnas was at)…I should be boasting to people I’ve been Rambo’s buddy for over 30 years !! I should at least be working with him on Movie projects don’t you think? WTF? Come on Rambo dick, don’t you dare say you don’t know me because I have a picture to prove it.

  2. Manqueman says:

    In their electoral support for Trump disguised as reporting, one of the overlooked facts is that he was one of the two candidates who had the greatest negative numbers ever. He ended up outpolled and selected for office by the Electoral College (which exists to weaken democracy, not support it). It necessarily follows, that there should be an issue whether his numbers are significantly better now, as a candidate. (Yeah, yeah, I know, his average poll numbers are slightly better than they were in 2016 but I’m not sure that polls as candidate and polls as POTUS would necessarily match.)

  3. Katrina Brown says:

    My father would have called Trump ” a boorish clod.” He just doesn’t belong in polite society, much less the presidency.

  4. Susan says:

    I wonder if the writer is aware that Lev Parnas has been working for the Trump family for over 30 years? At age 16 he began working for Fred Trump and then went on to work for Donald at his many businesses, hotels and golf courses etc. So for Trump to claim he doesn’t know the man, is bizarre.

  5. Jean Martin says:

    My parents were Republicans. My parents were intelligent, educated people. For the past 3 years I have been wondering what has happened to their party. Perhaps a few of them have finally come to their senses.

    (My dad would have called Donald Trump an idiot, if there were ladies present. My mom would have called him an ass, meaning donkey. Not the kindest thing to say about donkeys.)