Bloomberg Unveils Voter Protection Policy Proposal

Michael Bloomberg
Michael Bloomberg, former mayor of New York and current 2020 presidential candidate. Photo credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Reading Time: 3 minutesProtecting Out Vote 2020

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Friday became the latest Democratic presidential candidate to unveil a proposal to bolster voting rights. His plan aims to end racial disparity in voting and modernize election infrastructure.

The policy rollout came as Bloomberg joined Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams and others for an invite-only summit on voting rights Friday morning in Atlanta. The billionaire recently donated $5 million to Abrams’s Fair Fight organization.

“The right to vote is the fundamental right that protects all of the others, but in states around the country, it is under attack,” Bloomberg said in a statement. “That’s a disgrace to our Constitution and an insult to generations of people who fought and marched to win the right to vote.”

Bloomberg’s proposal calls for a “new national Voting Rights Act” that includes same-day and automatic voter registration, pre-registering 16- and 17-year-olds, and expanding access to early voting. 

His plan would also ban states from purging voter rolls based on inactivity, incomplete cross-checks, or returned mail.

The proposal would establish a nonpartisan commission to set federal standards for voting in federal elections, but would not bar states from imposing voter ID requirements. Instead, voter ID states would have to accept sworn affidavits of eligibility.

Millions of Americans were denied access to the ballot box in 2016 due to felony convictions, most of them people of color. Bloomberg’s plan would automatically restore voting rights for individuals with felony convictions once they complete their incarceration — except for those convicted of murder or a sexual crime. Nearly a dozen states, including Iowa and Virginia, require formerly incarcerated individuals to reapply for their rights post-incarceration.

The proposal includes ending partisan gerrymandering, which most often disenfranchises communities of color, by establishing independent redistricting commissions. In 2008, Bloomberg campaigned in California to pass a proposition for a similar system that kept elected and appointed officials from drawing maps.

For Stacey Abrams, Voter Suppression Is Personal

Klobuchar Grabs the Election Integrity Lane

From 2008 to 2016, nearly 15,000 polling places were closed nationwide. Some 1,500 of those closures occurred in the South since the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder. Bloomberg’s plan would set federal standards for designating a sufficient number of polling places per capita and require states to place them in areas near public transportation. The plan would also expand early voting to at least 15 days prior to Election Day, implement no-excuse vote-by-mail, and require all provisional ballots be counted.

More states are swapping their outdated touchscreen voting machines with hand-marked paper ballots after Russia’s attempt to manipulate voting machines and voter registration systems throughout the country during the 2016 election. Similar to Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-MA) plan, Bloomberg’s would require the Department of Homeland Security to conduct threat assessments and provide funding for states to conduct risk-limiting audits before certifying new voting machines.

His plan would require state-of-the-art voting machines and standardize paper ballots, while also providing election officials and poll workers with federal funding for training and technical assistance on Election Day.

Bloomberg called out President Donald Trump’s “attack on voting rights” in his statement, arguing that the president “never misses an opportunity to undermine the American voter system.” Shortly after Trump was inaugurated — and apparently stung by losing the popular vote by three million votes — he launched an election integrity commission in search of voter fraud that was disbanded quickly without finding any wrongdoing.

“President Trump’s Presidential Commission on Election Integrity was dissolved after several lawsuits, but not before asking for Texas records for all voters with Hispanic surnames, a blatantly racist act,” Bloomberg stated.

The former mayor also criticized Facebook’s policy of not fact-checking political advertisements, and condemned what he characterized as Trump’s “embrace of foreign election interference.”


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from COP PARIS / Flickr and Georgia Sierra Club / Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0).

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

2 responses to “Bloomberg Unveils Voter Protection Policy Proposal”

  1. Manqueman says:

    Bloomberg’s “vision” is what, for whatever reason, is irking me about this cycle: The ignoring of the fact that a lot of what’s discussed will never, ever happen while the GOP dominates. Biden with his working the people across the aisle (Republicans in Congress), notwithstanding all he accomplished in 2011-2017 and Bloomberg’s bogus Rx given that both the GOP dominated SCOTUS as well as Republican state governments have all made clear that their goal is to restrict voting by those unlikely to vote GOP as much as possible. As for a new Voting Rights Act, I’m sure Bloomberg can draft one that would have a workaround for Shelby County which was based on a finding that there’s no longer a need for a VRA. Without a strong, progressive (or at least liberal), blue Congress, doesn’t much matter who’s elected in 2020 — and none of the wannabes are saying so. It’s all about them for all of them.

  2. Michael Petersen says:

    “Bloomberg’s plan would set federal standards for designating a sufficient number of polling places per capita and require states to place them in areas near public transportation.” Doesn’t this seem to be ignorant of reality? Unlike most of Europe, the United States, outside of places like New York City, Boston, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, etc (in short, large metro areas), has little to no public transportation, mandating polling places only near public transportation points would seem to just provide more opprotunities to disenfranchise large areas of the country.