The Long History of Near Disasters Involving Nukes

The Lost Nuke
The Lost Nuke from the 1950 crash of US B-36 in British Columbia. Photo credit: Dano / Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

Both Republicans and Democrats have expressed concern about entrusting presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump with the country’s nuclear codes. Some have wondered aloud if the ultimate weapons of mass destruction should be under the control of someone so erratic and vindictive.

The prospect of Trump’s finger on such a trigger makes a lot of people across the globe uneasy. But the truth is, no matter who serves as commander-in-chief, a nuclear holocaust has always been closer than we think — because of faulty equipment, dumb accidents and apparently irreducible human error.

The Union of Concerned Scientists has now put together a list of some of the near misses the world has survived. Each one is hair-raising. Taken together, they are utterly terrifying.

1961 B-52 crash marker

Road marker in Eureka, NC, commemorating the 1961 B-52 crash.
Photo credit: RJHaas / Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Bombs on a Plane

.

Putting nuclear weapons on manned airplanes has led to near disasters several times. In 1966, a bomber carrying four nuclear warheads collided with a refueling plane and crashed over Spain (the link will take you to a Pentagon memo detailing 32 accidents involving nuclear weapons from 1950-1980).

Two of the bombs exploded but neither nuclear warhead was triggered. Another bomb landed in a riverbed and was recovered, while the fourth fell into the Mediterranean and was not secured for several weeks.

While none of the nuclear warheads went off, some plutonium was released at the crash site, which remains contaminated to this day.

Five years earlier, a B-52 bomber broke apart in flight and the two nuclear weapons it carried dropped on North Carolina. The arming sequence of both bombs began, and one slammed into the ground after its parachute failed. While the chute of the other nuclear weapon deployed, five of its safety devices failed and the one that prevented the bomb from going off was later found to be defective in other nuclear bombs.

A uranium-containing part of one of the bombs was never recovered.

The horror stories of close calls do not end in the 1960s. Less than ten years ago, a bomber was mistakenly loaded with six nuclear-armed cruise missiles and sat unguarded at an Air Force base in North Dakota overnight. Then the plane took the weapons to Louisiana, where they were once again left unguarded until a maintenance crew realized that it held live nuclear weapons.

Nuclear Command and Control System

Nuclear Command and Control System
Photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from DoD Inspector General

Faulty Chips and Crossed Wires

.

But nuclear weapons are not just a risk while in the air. There have been many instances in which things went mind-numbingly wrong on the ground.

In 1961, the US assumed it was under attack and ordered all bombers to prepare for takeoff.

The assumption was based on an inability to reach either an early warning radar system in Greenland or the North American Aerospace Defense (NORAD), which led officials to think that an attack might be underway.

It was later determined that a faulty AT&T switch was to blame and that the company had not installed a backup system — even though it said it had.

Nearly two decades later, at a high point of tension between the US and the Soviet Union, a defective computer chip costing less than 50 cents caused US missile-defense officials to believe that the Soviet Union had launched more than 2,000 nuclear missiles.

It took six minutes to correct the mistake. Had this incident not taken place in the middle of the night, it is conceivable that the US could have “retaliated.”

In 2010, there was another significant malfunction: the launch control center at Warren Air Force Base lost contact with 50 nuclear missiles for an hour. The reason: an incorrectly installed circuit card.

NORAD

North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).
Photo credit: MSGT Hiyashi / Wikimedia

Wrenches, Bears, and Simulations

.

And then there are the cases that seem stranger than fiction.

In 1979, NORAD computers showed a massive Soviet attack on the US — with missiles raining down from mobile launch sites and silos alike. American bombers were readied for a retaliatory strike that was only called off when US early warning stations and satellites could not confirm the inbound missiles.

What had happened? A technician had mistakenly loaded a tape with a training exercise onto an operational computer.

Another time, a maintenance worker dropped the socket from a socket wrench into an underground missile silo, releasing the missile’s propellant. Despite efforts at containment, the fuel exploded and the nuclear weapon shot up in the air and crashed near the entrance of the base. That particular warhead was more powerful than all bombs used in World War II combined.

In another incident, a bear breached the perimeter fence at a base in Minnesota — and was mistaken for a saboteur.

All surrounding bases were alerted that a Soviet sabotage effort might be under the way. Because the alarm at Wisconsin’s Volk Field was wired incorrectly, nuclear-armed fighters there were ordered to take off. As they were sitting on the runway waiting for clearance, a staffer rushed out to alert the pilots that they should stay put. He saved the day by flashing the headlights of his truck — because the base had no control tower!

Some of these stories might qualify as slapstick-comical if they had not nearly resulted in the deaths of thousands — or even the end of the world as we know it. And these are only the incidents we know about on the US side.

Not surprisingly, the Soviet Union has had plenty of near misses, which the Union of Concerned Scientists also details.

While many of these cases show that it does matter whose finger is on the trigger, together they add up to unblinkable evidence that the mere existence of nuclear weapons — combined with poor regulation and an ever-fertile fund of human stupidity — constitutes a clear and present danger to us all.


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore / Flickr – CC BY-SA 2.0)

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

9 responses to “The Long History of Near Disasters Involving Nukes”

  1. alohajim says:

    Very curious that, after 70 plus years no nukes have gone off anywhere despite these ‘accidents’. Further, as more and more nations have joined the ‘nuclear club’ that means that these nations have each had the capability of manufacturing nukes for a very long time. Common sense tells me that the manufacturing process could not be that complicated or difficult. With a world filled with ‘terrorists’ of every stripe not one nuke has fallen into their hands? Credit must be given to all of the many government workers and politicians worldwide that have done an absolutely incredible job of keeping us safe from nuclear armaggedon. What’s amazing is that there are people that claim nukes don’t exist – imagine that!

  2. Jack Strawb says:

    You mentioned Trump, not Clinton. As ridiculous and even absurdist as a Trump presidency would be, Clinton would probably be a greater danger to the world, as Robert Parry writes in “The Bigger Nuclear Risk: Trump or Clinton”

  3. Eric John says:

    Great piece, thank you.

    It’s not at all far-fetched, too, to imagine a President Trump in a Cuban Missle crisis-type nuclear showdown with someone like Kim Jong Un. Then using a small naval skirmish as a pretext to use the Bomb to re-establish the American supremacy of post-WWII. (“Make America Great /Again/” does not mean nothing).

  4. soularddave says:

    Because Trump is a concern at this point. To my observation, he’s demonstrated more bad judgment in his adult (public) life than good.

    Anyone who’s got the ability to kill others needs to be predictable.

  5. haifisch8587 says:

    Why was this article begun by representing Trump as a rogue who couldn’t be trusted with nukes? On seeing such obvious anti-Trump bias, I decided to skip reading the article.

    • Peter Quinn says:

      As did I….

    • Eric John says:

      Truth is, with Trump’s indisciplined temper and taste for drama, nuclear accidents are the least of our concern. So you’re right, in a way this article is irrelevant.

  6. CapAndFree says:

    Now let’s actually do something about decreasing the nuclear count in the world. Let’s start by petitioning the United States to decrease its nuclear count to just 10 active weapons. We can do more from there, and nations around tthe world should and would be influenced to make the change themselves down to a 10 nuke limit, if the U.S. took the first step.

  7. goingnowherefast says:

    Humans may be smart enough to have invented these things, but they are clearly far too accident prone to possess them.