New FBI Tactic Hints at Big DC Cover-up of Saudi 9/11 Funding

Barack Obama, King Abdullah
President Barack Obama meets King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, July 2014. Photo credit: US Embassy Riyadh / Flickr.
Reading Time: 5 minutes

In the latest indication of a rolling government cover-up of the September 11, 2001, attacks, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is disowning an explosive internal report that suggests high-level Saudi involvement. And Washington seems only too happy to accept this latest peculiar FBI apologia.

The same FBI that attempted to hide its prior relationship with accused Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev—until that link was outed by the Russian FSB security service—is now rewriting its involvement in the worst terror attack on American soil.

In this bizarre development, the Bureau claims that an internal FBI document indirectly tying the alleged Al Qaeda hijackers to a prominent Saudi prince was fabricated.

If the FBI is telling the truth and its own agent simply made the whole thing up, that would in itself be a remarkable and essentially unprecedented development.

But since we have reason to believe—as you shall see—that the FBI agent did not make it up, the Bureau’s claim is prima facie evidence of a cover-up: one that could only be authorized at the highest levels, for reasons which will become apparent.


The FBI’s disavowal of its own agent’s April 16, 2002 report was revealed in a new 128–page publication released March 25 by a Congressionally authorized entity called the 9/11 Review Commission. (This is not to be confused with either Congress’s original Joint Inquiry or the “independent” 9/11 commission chaired by Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton.)

The new report, whose three co-authors include former Reagan attorney general Ed Meese and former Democratic Congressman Tim Roemer, credits the FBI with “making great strides” in protecting the country from terrorism, while scolding the Bureau for putting out incorrect information, back in 2002, regarding the alleged Saudi Connection.

This seems like an odd time to go back 12 years to “clear up” the record.

Indeed, former Senator Bob Graham of Florida, who co-chaired Congress’s Joint Inquiry into 9/11, remarkably told the Florida Bulldog, an investigative news site, that he did not even know that the newest 9/11 Review Commission existed—until this new report came out. And he expressed continued misgivings about the way the Saudi connection has been treated.

“The FBI has served America through most of its history,” he told the Bulldog. “There were stumbles by the agency before 9/11 and since the tragedy there has been a consistent effort to cover up the extent of Saudi Arabia’s involvement. Let’s let the American people know what happened and have… a serious discussion of what happened, why it happened, where it was adverse to U.S. interests and how to avoid its repetition.”

What We Know

In 2011, on the tenth anniversary of the still-astonishing attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, a nonprofit Florida investigative news site, the Broward Bulldog (now the Florida Bulldog), published an article tying a number of the alleged 9/11 hijackers to a wealthy Saudi family living in a gated community in Sarasota, Florida.

Neighbors had noticed that the family fled abruptly from their house just days before the 9/11 attacks—and investigators later discovered that the owners had left behind cars, furniture, clothing, food and other articles, giving the unmistakable impression of a hasty departure. The family never moved back.

Further investigation revealed that some of the 9/11 hijackers had visited the Sarasota residence, and phone records showed communication with others. Evidence was corroborated in part by the direct knowledge of a security official at the complex, and a Florida senior counterterrorism officer.

A subsequent article in the Bulldog revealed the existence of a secret FBI document stating that the house’s inhabitants had “many connections to individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.” It provided details and even mentioned that one member of the Sarasota household was training to fly planes at the same facilities as the hijackers.

Protecting the Homeland—Or the Image of the FBI?

In case you were wondering why this wasn’t given bigger play at the time, we now learn that the FBI assured the little-known 9/11 Review Commission that there was nothing to its own 2002 report: “The FBI told the Review Commission that the (FBI document) on which the news article was based was ‘poorly written’ and wholly unsubstantiated.”

The FBI’s bad-mouthing its own earlier work comes via the Commission’s new report, “The FBI: Protecting the Homeland in the 21st Century”:

“When questioned later by others in the FBI, the special agent who wrote the EC (Electronic Communication) was unable to provide any basis for the contents of the document or explain why he wrote it as he did.”

The new report, which might better be titled “Protecting the FBI in the 21st Century,” offers no more information on this astonishing admission from the vaunted Bureau. It includes nothing on the agent’s identity or why this person would have fabricated such explosive information.

Meanwhile, a credible source in South Florida told WhoWhatWhy that the likely author of the FBI’s now-disavowed 2002 document was actually promoted to a super-sensitive inter-agency counterintelligence position shortly after writing his report.


WhoWhatWhy’s own investigation suggests that it is the Bureau, not its agent, putting out falsehoods. Last year, during a visit to the Sarasota area, I independently corroborated the crux of the Bulldog’s findings, and came upon intriguing new material which we are following up.

And in a 2011 investigation, WhoWhatWhy substantially expanded the Florida publication’s original work. We exposed that the owner of the house where some of the hijackers hung out was an influential Saudi, a direct lieutenant of a powerful Saudi prince. And we described how that Saudi prince, Sultan bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz Al-Saud, was himself among the first Saudis to learn piloting in Florida.

A leading advocate of teaching Saudis to fly, Prince Sultan is the founder and Chairman of the Board of the Saudi Aviation Club, and served as Chairman of the King Khaled International Airport (KKIA) Supervisory Committee. Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the 9/11 hijackers, trained to fly near Sarasota, as did some of his cohorts. Atta was one of those identified as visiting the house of the connected Saudis.

Friends of Jeb Bush

Prince Sultan’s family is part of a Saudi clique identified closely with the Bush family. Jeb Bush was governor of Florida at the time of the pilot training and terror attacks. For more on this relationship, see our 2011 article and my book Family of Secrets.

Sultan’s father, Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, the former Saudi defense minister, became King in January, 2015.

Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, the new King of Saudi Arabia.

Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, the new King of Saudi Arabia.

This added context is absolutely crucial to understanding why the US government would be uncomfortable with further investigation of links between one its most important global allies and the 9/11 attack on America.


Twenty-eight pages of the 2002 report from Graham’s 9/11 committee have been redacted by the federal government. Because they are classified, Graham has been unable to describe their contents in detail. But he has said they deal with the Saudis. As he told the Sarasota Herald Tribune:

“While I cannot talk about the details of the 28-page report since it is classified, I can say they are devoted to who funded the hijackers while they were in the United States, and point a strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the primary source. To that extent, the two are connected… They go to whether you believe the hijackers acted alone or had support.”

There’s an almost obscene irony at work here. Although 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals, the net effect of the 9/11 attacks was to strengthen the dictatorial hold of the Saudi royal family on Saudi Arabia, because that country was seen as essential to regional and global security—ostensibly as a bulwark against these very sorts of terror acts.

Thanks to the games the FBI continues to play, the evidence suggesting operational links between high-ranking Saudis and the 9/11 perpetrators has been almost completely ignored by the American and international media, including almost all of the so-called “alternative” media.

Surely it is long past time to ask who is being “protected” by efforts to keep this story from the public.


Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


27 responses to “New FBI Tactic Hints at Big DC Cover-up of Saudi 9/11 Funding”

  1. Title

    […]the time to read or visit the subject material or web-sites we have linked to beneath the[…]

  2. K. Chris C. says:

    The Saudis may or may not have had a connection to the treason and war crimes of 9/11–I just don’t know for sure.

    An American citizen, not US subject.

  3. Christopher Brooks says:

    I agree, the Saudi connection appears to be a trick. Look over here!
    We are hiding something we want to draw attention towards!
    Are you confused and frustrated enough yet?
    We can play this game for ever.
    We have a printing press.

    • John Cathy says:

      Hey, Haven’t you heard, EmreS says no kooks on this site. He has no time for it with all his important works.
      Tune into CNN and go to sleep

  4. John Cathy says:

    This whole Saudi thing IS A DISTRACTION. It will amount to nothing. Have fun with it, but its meant to distract.

    • EmreS says:

      From what?

    • John Cathy says:

      From the real powers that committed 911.
      This is an intelligence operation. Might as wll blame it on Iraq; they had nothing to do with it.
      Agencies within the US Gov.

    • EmreS says:

      That’s plainly false. The hijackers are almost all Saudi, and if this article is correct the royal family is connected to them, so clearly that country does have something to do with it. You’re not claiming the hijackers were merely pretending to be Saudi, are you?

    • John Cathy says:

      Plainly Wrong. Check you premises.
      There were no hijackers. There were no Saudis.
      Sounds crazy doesn’t it.
      Could it be true? No planes really hit the building?
      Hmmm. Don’t want to go there

    • EmreS says:

      Yeah, it could be true in the same way we might be shadows in Plato’s cave. This is a site for sceptics, not kooks.

    • John Cathy says:

      So Skeptics are ok. Why then are you not skeptical of the 911 story. If you are not skeptical of that story you either.blocked and can’t look at the facts (acceptance of the official story) or a shill. One alternative can be fixed,
      Good luck

    • EmreS says:

      As if your kooky idea is the only alternative. No planes and no Arab hijackers? Go waste someone else’s time.

    • John Cathy says:

      Your time is too precious to even look. You must be working on the cure for cancer. Sorry to disturb.

    • Mick Price says:

      Yeah somehow they got the Saudis to act suspiciously mere days before they did this operation, without telling them anything about it. They managed to get other Saudis to act suspiciously for MONTHS. It’s the magic CIA, the friend of loons everywhere.

  5. TeganMathis says:

    In recent testimony, Zacarias Moussaoui accused Saudi royals of being privy to a plot to attack Air Force One in the summer of 2001:

    Without corroboration, this claim is easily dismissed. However, we do have corroboration, and it comes from the Bush administration.

    Immediately after the September 11 attacks, multiple Bush administration officials, in an effort to explain Bush’s late return to Washington DC, disseminated a series of ridiculous stories about terrorists targeting Air Force One. In the end, they settled on a silly story about Dick Cheney inadvertently uttering the phrase “Angel is next,” causing the Air Force One flight crew to retreat. (Angel is the widely known code name for Air Force One.)

    In light of this new claim by Zacarias Moussaoui, the Air Force One stories (the outrageous Bush administration lies) must be reexamined.

    Shortly before September 11, Moussaoui was arrested. One has to wonder if his arrest was a direct result of the alleged Air Force One plot. Perhaps the Saudis tipped off the Bush administration to the coming attack.

    If so, it would not only explain all of the Air Force One lies, but it would confirm that the Bush administration had extremely specific advance knowledge of the attacks. In fact, it would suggest that they took action to protect themselves (they arrested Moussaoui), but they neglected to protect us.

  6. John Public says:

    EXPLOSIVES took down the Twins and WTC 7…Saudi involvement only went as far as the hijackings…if that..the hijackers were a distraction from the real operation which was perpetrated by someone else….(Pentagon was hit by a missile)…Also..Saudis couldn’t have turned off US air defense systems..inside/outside job..FBI probably fabricated the report to cover for someone else

  7. Spearman says:

    Anthony Summers in his “The Eleventh Day” goes a long way in establishing the Saudi complicity. Another interesting connection to the whole dynamic of the ME invasions is the death of Minnesota US Senator Paul Wellstone. Wellstone was a key vote in the runup to the invasions. He was threatened by VP Cheney during this time. Coincidentally the co-pilot of Wellstone’s ill-fated plane
    trip to northern Minnesota that resulted in his death was flying the plane because the pilot was working on minimal sleep. The co-pilot was also complicit in providing the 20th 9/11 hijacker, Zacharias Moussoui with the software instructions for flying a commercial airliner. He worked part-time for both companies involved in Wellstone’s death, Executive Air & Pan Am Flight School. Both are headquartered in the MSP metro area. The co-pilot was trained at the Unv. of North Dakota flight school in Grand Forks, N.Dak. that also subcontracts with numerous foreign commercial and military flight operations for training purposes

  8. Cover-ups says:

    Analagously, is it also going to take this much time to uncover any cover-up in the marathon bombing?

  9. empiricist2 says:

    Also read The Big Bamboozle by Phillip Marshall who did not get a chance to finish is next book because he mysteriously was found dead along with his children and dog. He is a former pilot and goes into the many connections 9/11 had with US gov’t, Bush’s mysterious actions and why, and how the pilots most likely had jetliner training with Saudi instructors at the CIA site in Nevada where there are 60+ jetliners stored. Nobody could fly the planes w/o such training. The Saudi funding is also well documented using existing evidence from the 9/11 gov’t investigations.

  10. gustave courbet says:

    To Mr. Baker or his associates: On the off chance that you read the comment section, you might be interested in the work that indie journalist Daniel Hopsicker has done on the connections between Saudi 911 Hijackers and Venice, Florida.

  11. Alan8 says:

    There are many cover-ups. The most glaring is government/corporate media conspiracy to cover up evidence of controlled demolition of the three WTC skyscrapers, such as this:

  12. cactuspie says:

    Anyone who wants to understand 9-11 should start by reading Bob Graham’s “Security Matters” and Michael Ruppert’s “Crossing The Rubicon.” Whatever happened to the cries of ‘never forget’?

  13. Jon Gold says:

    Please listen to my interview with Senator Bob Graham.

  14. Nicko Thime says:

    Anyone who doesn’t know that the Saudis were behind 9/11It isn’t just the ties to the Saudis which are being concealed, it is which Americans were in league with those Saudis that is really being concealed. You all know it, you just don’t want to know it.

    • lofty1 says:

      It’s not that we don’t want to know it. It’s that the Americans in league
      with those Saudis don’t want it to be known and will stop at nothing to
      prevent it from becoming known.

    • Nicko Thime says:

      Okay, I can go with that.

    • punkyboy says:

      Not to mention labeling as “conspiracy theory” any attempt to get at the bottom of the whole 9/11 tragedy. That’s how you sweep stuff under the rug around here – yell “conspiracy theory” and everyone is supposed be embarrassed and shut up. Thank goodness there are people like Baker who continue to dig for the truth.