A Closer Look at the Secret Service - WhoWhatWhy

A Closer Look at the Secret Service

Reading Time: 6 minutes

Secret Service agents are one category of law enforcement whose agents typically get the glory treatment. Recent books by members of JFK’s secret service detail, almost devoid of revelations or candor, have nevertheless received lots of positive coverage. Meanwhile, legitimate questions about the service—how it works, what kinds of people it employs, how effective it is—are pushed aside.

Maybe that’s why the media reacted with such astonishment to learn that Secret Service agents preparing for Obama’s visit to Cartagena, Colombia, consorted with prostitutes. Eight agents have been forced out of their jobs, and a ninth is on his way out. Military personnel along on the trip are under investigation as well. The activity raised questions not only about the appropriateness of such conduct, but of whether this behavior threatened the President’s safety.

Just a One-Time Thing, Folks

Now the government is saying that the Cartagena hijinks were an aberration. Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano assured the Senate Judiciary Committee last week that the Secret Service’s Office of Professional Responsibility had received zero complaints of agent misconduct in the last two and a half years. That means total good behavior in roughly 900 foreign and 13,000 domestic trips.

But here’s the problem: it’s the Secret Service assuring us that the Secret Service is squeaky clean. The matter of self-policing came up last week when Napolitano faced the Senate committee. As ABC reports, Napolitano claimed that the Homeland Security Inspector General was supervising the investigation, but the IG’s own office said it was merely “monitoring” the Secret Service’s self-examination, and would review it when it was complete.

Since the events of April 12, a probe has grown, and investigators are very much just getting started. And not just about Colombia: the Associated Press reported on inquiries into possible Secret Service liaisons with strippers and prostitutes leading up to an Obama visit to El Salvador last year. And some agents are contending that cavorting and drinking heavily is actually quite common.

In fact, there are many other questions about the Secret Service and about presidential security that are not being properly addressed. Coming as we approach the 50th anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s violent death, these are not idle concerns.

Obama and Kennedy
As we have noted here previously, the agency has been involved in serious security lapses and misjudgment before. For example, in Obama’s first year in office, the agency failed to keep an unauthorized couple with a hankering for publicity from getting into the White House and close to the President—and there may be more to the story.

Then, in 2011, a classified booklet containing Obama’s schedule, down to the minute, along with details on his security contingent, was found lying in a Canberra, Australia, gutter during an Obama visit to that country.

Those incidents are reported to have upset Obama—and that’s certainly understandable. Meanwhile, his trip to Colombia, intended to showcase new trade initiatives with Latin America, was totally overshadowed by the scandal. Presidential trips are carefully calculated to generate positive publicity and create goodwill at home and abroad, so the prostitution sideshow just wiped that one out.

Such incidents are not just bad for image—they raise all kinds of issues in the safety area. For one thing, the agents themselves are compromised, even made susceptible to pressure and blackmail, particularly if they want to keep their jobs and if, as in numerous cases, the agents were married.

But this is not new. Go back almost half a century, and look at the most shocking dereliction of duty ever—the failures that made it easy for someone (or someones) to assassinate John F Kennedy. The failings are endless, from not insisting that the bubble top go on Kennedy’s car, to having too few Secret Service agents protecting the president, to authorizing a particularly dangerous route that slowed the car way down, to allowing it to go through a canyon of windows—and then not checking or securing the windows or installing spotters or sharpshooters. A grade school kid could have done a more serious job of protecting the president.

Here’s an excerpt from Warren Commission questions to Special Agent Winston Lawson, who headed the Secret Service detail for Kennedy’s Dallas trip:

Mr. McCloy:

During the course of the motorcade while the motorcade was in motion, no matter how slowly, you had no provision for anyone on the roofs?

Mr. Lawson:

No, sir.

Mr. McCloy:

Or no one to watch the windows?
Mr. Lawson:

Oh, yes. The police along the area were to watch the crowds and their general area. The agents riding in the followup car as well as myself in the lead car were watching the crowds and the windows and the rooftops as we progressed.


Mr. Stern:

What were the instructions that you asked be given to the police who were stationed on overpasses and railroad crossings?

Mr. Lawson:

They were requested to keep the people to the sides of the bridge or the overpass so that-or underpass– so that people viewing from a vantage point like that would not be directly over the President’s car so that they could either inadvertently knock something off or drop something on purpose or do some other kind of harm.

And yet we continue to let this agency off the hook. We forgot that even LBJ, a direct beneficiary of the agency’s sloppiness with his former boss, trusted the outfit so little himself that he inquired at one point whether he could have the FBI protect him instead.

A Telling Bumper Sticker

It is foolish to ignore the worldviews and attitudes of people expected to protect presidents. Former Secret Service agent Abraham Bolden has described rampant racism and widespread contempt for Kennedy and his policies among Bolden’s fellow officers.

Now, here are a few salient details about the Secret Service today that go beyond trying to get a little “R&R”:  When Washington Post reporters visited the Virginia home of Texas native David R. Chaney, one of the Secret Service supervisors on the Colombia trip, they found a silver pickup truck parked in front. On the vehicle they spotted a bumper sticker with an outline of the state of Texas, and the word “secede.”

It is interesting to note that Chaney’s father served in the Secret Service when Kennedy was in office. As assistant agent in charge of personnel, he was friends with many of the agents who were in Dallas in November, 1963.

Speaking of Dallas, consider these excerpts from a Warren Commission affidavit of Texas Sen. Ralph Yarborough, who was riding in the motorcade:

After the shooting, one of the secret service men sitting down in the car in front of us pulled out an automatic rifle or weapon and looked backward. However, all of the secret service men seemed to me to respond very slowly, with no more than a puzzled look. In fact, until the automatic weapon was uncovered, I had been lulled into a sense of false hope for the President’s safety, by the lack of motion, excitement, or apparent visible knowledge by the secret service men, that anything so dreadful was happening. Knowing something of the training that combat infantrymen and Marines receive, I am amazed at the lack of instantaneous response by the Secret Service, when the rifle fire began. I make this statement in this paragraph reluctantly, not to add to the anguish of anyone, but it is my firm opinion, and I write it out in the hope that it might be of service in the better protection of our Presidents in the future.

In the early 60s, Secret Service protection was downright awful. Henry Bosworth, the late editor of the Quincy Sun newspaper in Massachusetts, used to recount how he climbed aboard a press bus with no credentials, was asked no questions nor frisked for weapons, and found himself inside Hyannisport having drinks with JFK himself.

And how is it now? Here’s an account of a WhoWhatWhy friend, from an Obama campaign stop in Grand Forks, North Dakota, in April, 2008.

The night before I went to the convention center/domed stadium about 10pm & was walking the convention center concourse when I encountered a private security guard.  We made small talk & soon he volunteered that his job the next day was to escort Obama from the ballroom through the kitchen into the main arena for the speech.

I said to him that sounds like the scenario from the RFK scene in 1968.  He didn’t know what I meant.  I clued him in.  The point is the SS was stupid enough to allow an amateur to be a part of security.

The next day I positioned myself by the kitchen exit, not that close but in a position to be the 1st person that Obama would greet if he were to go toward those seats.  I reminded an SS agent about the discussion with the security guard from the night before & he agreed that it shouldn’t have happened but he wasn’t in the area when Obama did walk out as I had been told he would.  The security guard actually walked over to me & thanked me for giving him a story to tell his grandkids.  I guess the glitches in security are more common than we imagine—but more likely if you have hookers on your mind.

Oh, by the way: during renewed government inquiries into JFK’s death in the 1990s, the Secret Service destroyed crucial assassination-related records.

[box] WhoWhatWhy plans to continue doing this kind of groundbreaking original reporting. You can count on it. But can we count on you? We cannot do our work without your support. Please click here to donate; it’s tax deductible. And it packs a punch.[/box]

GRAPHIC: http://www.anchorties.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/ap_obama_secret_service_090120_ssh1.jpg

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


13 responses to “A Closer Look at the Secret Service”

  1. Avatar dyannne says:

    All the Secret Service lapses you’ve mentioned occurred and are occurring on Democratic presidents. Have there been any serious lapses for Republican presidents? I know Ronald Reagan was shot, but not mortally wounded. Was that considered a lapse in judgement by the SS or something that couldn’t be prevented considering the circumstances? 

    • Avatar A. Benway says:

      Well, the avuncular old (some say senile) Ray’ was mortally wounded and was very close to death. Naturally, however, if he had “passed on”, we would have had the honest and comforting Mr. B to step up to the plate, so to speak, and save us from ruin. How astonishing – such a coincidence!  Yes, there are coincidences, very many coincidences…

    • Avatar Al21 says:

       Reagan was quite close to death. Had they got to the hospital any later, H.W. would have been president.
      There were also two assassination attempts within 17 days of one another on Gerald Ford. There were also attempts on H.W. and Nixon as well. In the case of the latter two, the plot was foiled before they were even close to pulling it off. There were also three attempts on W. with the last one being a grenade thrown on  the stage where he and his wife were standing.

  2. Avatar Vincebethel says:

    Please see:

    Vince Palamara
    Secret Service Literary Expert

  3. Avatar james says:

    Didn’t the Secret Service end up partying until dawn at one of Jack Ruby”s clubs the morning of the assassination?

    • Avatar A. Benway says:

      …and was Ruby the resident “fixer” in li’l ol’ Dallas? Could it be that the “fix” was exactly what he did as his final significant act?

      In those halcyon days before the Mob was subsumed by the Occult Ministry (or the other way ’round) virtually every police department had a working relationship with the Mob – according to David Maurer in “The Big Con”…

  4. Avatar John Judge says:

    John J. McCloy’s sordid past is outlined in the book The Chairman by Kai Bird. He did investigate the Black Tom explosion but tried to exonerate the Germans. He was an American proto-fascist who admired Hitler.

    His law firm Sullivan and Cromwell remained in Germany after the serious pogroms against the Jewish population began and the junior partners had to revolt to get McCloy to change his mind.

    He, along with Earl Warren (of the Commission) and General Groves (of the atomic bomb Manhattan project) were the main architects of the massive Japanese citizen relocation to internment camps in the US. He was unapologetic for the rest of his life, later opposing any reparations to the families.

    McCloy worked directly under Stimson, the Secretary of War, and wrote a letter you can now see at the Holocaust Museum, informing an international Jewish organization that he would not bomb the Auschwitz death camp or the rail lines leading to it with American planes since it might “lead to repercussions against the Jews'”.

    McCloy was appointed civilian High Commissioner of Germany after Hitler fell and succeded General Lucius Clay, the immediate military commander. Both of them were instrumental in pardoning or or assisting key Nazi spies, scientists and others to avoid prosecution for their war crimes and to escape into the US CIA and NASA among other places. See also Minister Without Portfolio in the Atlantic magazine years ago about his life.

    Marcel Ophuls, the filmmaker who produced “Memory of Justice” about the Nuremberg war crimes trials, said that he tried to interview McCloy for the documentary but he declined saying, “Mr. Ophuls, I am a very busy man, I don’t have time to philosophize about Nuremberg.” A woman at the film showing asked Ophuls about McCloy, “Is he connected to the multinational corporations?” Ophuls replied, “Madame, it would be more accurate to say they are connected to him.”

    The seven members of the Warren Commission were carefully chosen. Many of them, like Allen Dulles, John J. McCloy and John Sherman Cooper, who followed McCloy as America’s first Ambassador to West Germany overseeing the post-war period, were central to the movement of Nazi spies and aerospace scientists who played the major role in creation of the Cold War that JFK was threatening to end. They were part of the covert national security apparatus that JFK wanted to “scatter to the four winds”. In fact, JFK had fired Dulles as head of the CIA.

    Dulles and McCloy made arrangements with Nazi criminals who later surrounded and set up Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas as the patsy in JFK’s murder. The arranged capture of hundreds of scientists, including Wehrner von Braun, was implemented by an arrest carried out by Clay Shaw, later the prime suspect in New Orleans’s DA Jim Garrison’s investigation and charges of conspiracy in the death of JFK. As a friend of mine said long ago, “If you want to commit the perfect crime, control the investigation.”


  5. Avatar A. Benway says:

    I wish somebody else would say this, but…

    In the above excerpt given from the Warren Commission Mister McCloy is interrogating. McCloy has an interesting history. For example – and here I’m only fairly sure – McCloy was the poor kid whose mother gave everything for him, and who “made it” to the “big-time” when he successfully sued Germany for the Black Tom explosion – a sort of pre 911 episode that had, ahem, certain political consequences. McCloy may be seen as what some might call “a safe pair of hands”. Others might see him in another way…

  6. Avatar disinfo says:

    what do you think of Gordon Duff’s comments that the real story is that some ss insiders were to assissinate obama and that the white hats prevented it? (and the prostitute story is just a cover): 

  7. Avatar A. Benway says:

    Bolden’s autobiography seems to me to describe a Secret Service that got what it wanted.  And I wonder what this Secret Service wants too, but not very much – it seems obvious.

    • Avatar Russ Baker says:

      Bolden’s book is

      The Echo from Dealey Plaza

    • Avatar A. Benway says:

      Indeed it is. Of course Bolden’s story has to be considered according to the rules of classical rhetoric, which would categorize  his credibility approximately  equivalent to the SS itself, absent tangible evidence to discredit one party. In view of the still-emerging evidence some would say that Bolden’s telling the truth and the SS is self-serving. Moving to the present-day and the business at hand, I too wonder about the claim attributed above to Mr. Duff. Withal, quis custodet…

  8. Avatar JED says:

    Thanks Russ, maybe they need a new curfew? 

    Obama jokes but….who isn’t laughing?