Jill Stein
Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein, speaking at a town hall meeting in the Mesa Public Library in Mesa, Arizona, March 12, 2016. Photo credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has forced Pennsylvania to take a big step toward more transparent and accountable elections.

Following the 2016 election, Stein sued the state over its use of paperless voting machines. This week, the two parties reached a settlement that will ensure that all voters will use paper ballots in 2020.

“I think it’s a major victory for Pennsylvania voters and a major step forward for election integrity in the country,” counsel for the plaintiffs Ilann M. Maazel of Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP told WhoWhatWhy.

Prior to this, Democratic Governor Tom Wolf’s administration had already been pushing for paper ballots. This settlement builds upon that, mandating his commitment.   

Following the 2016 election, Stein campaigned for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania — three swing states Donald Trump won narrowly. Pennsylvania blocked the attempt, which caused Stein to sue the state over its use of paperless voting machines and overly burdensome recount procedures.

According to the Pew Research Center, about 28 percent of all US voters, and the majority of Pennsylvania voters, use direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machines, which Maazel says are “hackable, vulnerable and untrustworthy.” The settlement fixes that, ensuring all voters in the state will be using paper ballots by the 2020 primaries. Maazel says this moves the state away from its reputation as an “election integrity backwater,” giving it a role as a “potential model for the rest of the country.”

According to the settlement, new voting systems will be certified for use only if they meet three criteria:

A. The ballot on which each vote is recorded is paper; B. They produce a voter-verifiable record of each vote; and C. They are capable of supporting a robust pre-certification auditing process.

The settlement allows the plaintiffs to appoint an observer to attend the on-site certification process of these new voting systems. This observer can provide comments and concerns to the secretary of the commonwealth.

The “pre-certification auditing process” will be performed by each county before any election results are finalized. It will use “methods to be determined based on the recommendations of a Work Group established by the Secretary,” and “must happen automatically, without a request from voters or candidates.” The plaintiffs can choose 10 percent of the members of the work group, which will be formed by January 1, 2019, and complete its written report on auditing methods by January 1, 2020. This will function as a pilot in 2021, directed by the secretary; finalized auditing methods are to be fully implemented by the 2022 general election.

Additionally, the settlement mandates that defendants pay the plaintiffs $150,000 in attorneys’ fees.

This outcome is a victory not only for Stein and the 10,000 volunteers and 161,000 donors that backed her recount effort, but for the country as a whole, in the words of plaintiff counsel Maazel.

“When we filed the lawsuit in 2016, many people disregarded the danger of using outdated technology,” said Maazel. “Now it’s a mainstream issue about preserving and protecting democracy.”


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alexander F
Alexander F
2 years ago

Proof that the Green Party’s had another wonderful effect on making our country better.

2 years ago

Hey Clyde,
I hear you loud and clear. I’m thinking more and more like you every year. I have been trying to push 3rd Parties, esp (Libertarian), but the reality is right back to what you stated. Can we say Democracy or at least the process died?

Waiting to see what carrot they give us on the next election.

Deb Della Piana
2 years ago

Until money is removed from the political process, this is window dressing. It’s all about the money, both sides of the aisle.

Clyde J. Harkins
2 years ago

All this nonsense about “voting fraud” is an effort by the elites to convince the peasants that somehow voting makes a difference. What a lie?
It is money that buys elections and I don’t know anyone who does not have some idea that this is the case. The bigger government, the more corrupt it becomes. Go ahead and vote and put your stamp of approval on more slavery.

Subscribe to the Daily WhoWhatWhy

Relevant, in-depth journalism delivered to you.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.