Democracy Reform Advocates Hail HR 1 as First Step in a Winnable Battle

John Sarbanes, Democrats, House of Representatives, HR 1, For the People Act
Rep. John Sarbanes (D-MD) and other House Democrats hold a rally on the US Capitol steps for passage of HR 1 before returning to the House chamber to vote. The bill addresses campaign finance, voting rights, and ethics policy. Photo credit: C-SPAN
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Despite pushback in the Senate, advocates for democratic reforms say the recent House passage of sweeping election law changes is a critical “step one” in a three- to five-year battle to reclaim democracy.

Further, they say, the legislation package HR 1, known as the “For the People Act,” will sharply differentiate Democrats from Republicans in the 2020 elections.

House members passed HR 1  on a party-line vote (234–193) on March 8.

The 622-page bill introduced by Rep. John Sarbanes (D-MD) comprehensively addresses what activists see as fundamental problems facing American democracy, including corruption in Washington, voting rights and voter suppression, extreme partisan gerrymandering, campaign finance violations, and lax government ethics.

Fred Wertheimer, founder and president of Democracy 21, a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization dedicated to strengthening democracy, described HR 1 as “a holistic approach to fixing our political system and revitalizing our democracy.” The solutions outlined within the bill get to the core of what citizens want to see addressed, he said.

“It’s a huge victory for the American people and for the organizations and activists who have worked very hard to get to this point,” Wertheimer told WhoWhatWhy. “This is historic legislation. It’s unprecedented in the scope of the legislation and the beginning of an effort that will eventually succeed.”

HR 1 champions voting rights issues in the wake of significant election integrity issues that came to the forefront during the 2018 elections. The legislation would introduce online and automatic voter registration, same-day registration for federal elections, and a minimum of 15 early voting days. It would further establish Election Day as a federal holiday.

Legislation would also prevent issues with electronic voting machines by requiring paper ballots, reinstate voting rights for felons upon completion of their sentences, and address partisan gerrymandering by creating independent commissions to draw district lines.

Mitch McConnell

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks on the Senate floor regarding HR 1, January 30, 2019. Photo credit: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell / YouTube

Passage of HR 1 would additionally pave the way for legislators to restore facets of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 eliminated by the 2013 Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder. The Court’s ruling eradicated requirements for areas with histories of voter discrimination to receive clearance from federal officials before changing election and voting systems.

“[Passing HR1] means average voters will get a chance to actually have their voice heard in many ways,” Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, told WhoWhatWhy. “It’s designed to bring all of America back into our democratic system.”

“The bill distinguishes the Democratic Party from the Trump Republican Party as the 2020 election approaches,” Holman said. If Democrats maintain control of the House and regain a Senate majority, the bill will almost certainly become law.

But despite its passing the House, the Republican-controlled Senate and President Trump have promised HR 1 has no shot of becoming law. In a press conference before the vote, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) called the bill, which he nicknamed the “Democratic Politician Protection Act,” a “terrible proposal” and claimed particular aspects were “offensive to average voters.”

Holman predicts Senate Republicans will attempt to frame HR 1 as a partisan bill that overwhelmingly favors Democrats while trying “not to tread into what they’re actually saying, and that is they really don’t like democracy, and they don’t want people to participate in the political system.”

McConnell further stated the bill would not reach the floor of the Senate. But activists aren’t anticipating HR 1 to become law anytime soon.

“It is step one in a battle that I expect to take three to five years to win,” Wertheimer said. “The fact that Senator McConnell says he’s not going to call it up for a vote is meaningless to us. We’re not looking for or expecting the Senate to deal with it in this Congress.”

“Now,” Wertheimer said, “the major focus of activist organizations will be on obtaining Republican support for the legislation through grassroots lobbying efforts and addressing the issues during debates and on the campaign trail.”

“This is going to be a critical, watershed moment for the United States,” Holman said. “It is going to define the future of our country depending on how voters react to it in 2020.”

“If voters in 2020 decide that they don’t want these types of reforms and they’re happy with what Trump has offered them, that’s going to be a very, very different country than if the majority of voters side with the Democrats to say, ‘yes, we really do want democracy.’”


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from US House of Representatives.

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

2 responses to “Democracy Reform Advocates Hail HR 1 as First Step in a Winnable Battle”

  1. I’ve skimmed the legislation. It’s not a bill seeking enactment. It’s to deliver Dem talking points during Auction 2020, a device to beat up Republicans with.

    Example: the campaign finance “reform” portion of the bill is by itself about 200 pages. Bottom line: the Dems would keep elections financed by private donations, in other words continue the process whereby elected officials can be bought. With ~200 pages of legislation to litigate cases with.

    Campaign finance cannot rationally, in my view, be reformed without: [i] amending the Constitution to overcome a line of Supreme Court cases culminating in Citizens United, which equated campaign donations to free speech; and [ii] doing so in a way that *requires* all branches of government to get the money out of politics; and [iii] using a legal standard that can be enforced through citizen lawsuits.

  2. Eddie says:

    What is conspicuously absent in all this 622-pages of high-sounding rhetoric is that the donor class still owns the elections and Medicare for All is apparently off the table. And, We the People must trust the Democrats for “three to five years” that these miracles will materialize.