Voting Machine Vendor Threatens Election Transparency Group

AUDIT USA, Election Systems & Software
AUDIT USA received a cease and desist letter from Election Systems & Software. Photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from AUDIT USA

An Arizona-based election transparency activist group has received a cease-and-desist letter from the largest voting-system vendor in the US.  

Election Systems & Software (ES&S) sent its letter threatening to file a lawsuit against Americans United for Democracy, Integrity and Transparency in Elections (AUDIT-USA) this week.

“We’re going to reply very respectfully because they deserve that,” said John Brakey, director of AUDIT-USA. “But, we don’t take their trying to intimidate us very seriously, so basically they don’t need to wait 10 days to sue us. They can just go ahead and sue us.”

In the cease-and-desist letter, ES&S claims that the nonprofit has used materials belonging to the voting machine manufacturer, and that is a violation of copyright law.

“By using and posting ES&S’ Copyrighted Materials, Audit USA is providing a means to infringe ES&S’ copyright in its materials by enabling others to engage in unlimited and unauthorized downloading and publication of ES&S’ Copyrighted Materials,” the letter says.

However, Brakey argued that he was able to come into possession of ES&S product manuals through public record requests or through secretary of state offices in the country and that the bottom line is that ES&S does not want him, or anyone in the public, to have access to these manuals.

“We know what the laws are. We know that we have the right to these manuals. You know where I got them? I got them through records request,” Brakey said. “It’s a fair usage, and it’s for the public good.”

Brakey told WhoWhatWhy that AUDIT-USA has had issues with ES&S in the past regarding the sharing of product information about the voting machine company with the public. However, he added that the threat of legal action would not deter him or his group.

“We are being effective, and we’re getting people to ask questions about how their election system is working,” Brakey said.

One of the main motives Brakey has for sharing information about voting machines through the manuals is to inspire voters. He wants to prove that it’s possible to make elections transparent and accessible to US citizens.

“[In 2016] if ‘not voting’ was a presidential candidate, it won by a landslide — by 34 percent,” Brakey said. “Our democracy is in trouble because people are not voting anymore. I know a lot of people who don’t vote because they don’t believe it works. I’m trying to prove to people that elections do.”

The current threat the nonprofit has received has not stopped the organization from following its mission’s goal. Brakey and AUDIT-USA continue to publicly share concerns about state election departments around the country that destroy election ballot images. These digital images, under the law, are supposed to be saved for 22 months.

“We have a responsibility in our organization to help people understand how elections work,” he added. “And we are working hard … to make elections transparent, trackable and publicly verified, and that’s our mission.”

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

One response to “Voting Machine Vendor Threatens Election Transparency Group”

  1. Frank Henry says:

    John,… Keep up the good works….we the voters have an
    absolute constitutional right (via our 32 Full Voting Rights)
    to know how and who is voting and how and who is counting
    our votes. This knowledge/rights was honored until somehow
    the voting machine manufacturers have been unconstitutionally
    made Kings and Rulers via the false ‘copy rights’ mechanism
    used to block the voter’s Full Voting Rights. …… Also let us
    remember that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 reminds us of
    acts under the ‘color of law’ can not be used to block our
    full Voting Rights. ,,,, Thanks and Good Luck…..!!!