Massive Erie Snow Dump Facilitated by Climate Change

Snowpocalypse Brings Wild 2017 Weather to a Fitting End

lake-effect, Buffalo, New York
Historic lake-effect snow in Buffalo, New York area in 2014. Photo credit: Anthony Quintano / Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

Record-breaking snowfall in Pennsylvania earlier this week turns out to be another symptom of the earth heating up at record-breaking speeds, according to government scientists, while President Donald Trump thinks global warming could help eradicate the current cold snap.

The city of Erie was pummeled with 34 inches of snow on Christmas Day — an all-time daily snowfall record, beating the previous mark of 20 inches that had stood for over 60 years. Another 24.5 inches had fallen by Tuesday night, bringing the total since December 23 to more than 63 inches.

Why did so much snow fall? And does Trump have a point does all this snow mean our climate crisis is over? The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is the arm of the government that helps Americans “make decisions on how to manage climate-related risks and opportunities they face,” they say on their website. WhoWhatWhy reached out to them for an answer.

“If the lake had been frozen” as it usually is at this time of year — “this weather event wouldn’t have occurred.”

“The Erie snow was driven by a lake-effect event,” said Jake Crouch, scientist at NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information. “It’s been fairly warm there and the lake was not yet frozen.”  

Normally, when air this cold arrives, much of Lake Erie is frozen solid, so the cold air would pass across the lake surface without gathering up much moisture. This year, the air drew up moisture from the warmer water — which then fell as masses of snow.

“If the lake had been frozen” as it usually is at this time of year — “this weather event wouldn’t have occurred,” said Crouch.

Global Warming? But It’s Freezing Cold!

.

So the blockbuster snowfall in Erie was caused by climate change. But how could global warming possibly have anything to do with the frigid temperatures settling in to most of the northern US?

“Freezing” doesn’t seem to do justice to the temperatures that have enveloped the whole northeast of the country this week. Records were smashed in the midwest, where the temperature in International Falls, Minnesota, dipped to 37 degrees below zero, breaking a 93-year old record. And there’s more to come — the whole nation is in for an icy start to 2018. Surely this cold snap can give us hope that the scariest effects of global warming are overblown?

Sadly not. Crouch explained that “climate is defined as the average of conditions over a long period of time, and that is what is changing.” We will still have extreme winter weather events, but they will be less cold and will not last as long.

“The last several winters have been very warm in the US, on average, so although this exceptional cold is unusual when compared to winters of the recent past, if you compare it to winters of the 1960s and 70s these really cold outbreaks were more frequent.”

When the year’s weather is looked at in totality, climate change and its devastating impact on the entire world comes into clear focus: the epic hurricane season which decimated Puerto Rico and left Houston and its surroundings underwater; wildfires still burning in California; flooding in Bangladesh; drought in Somalia, Ethiopia, and the Middle East; and the brutal summer heatwave in Europe.

More of the Same?

.

So does climate change mean that weather will be as wild as this every year?

Crouch said it is difficult to tie the changing climate to individual extreme events. But the upward trend in average temperatures “creates the conditions that make extreme events more likely.” While Crouch’s team at NOAA cannot predict the future, they are collecting evidence from the past to help us understand what the world is in for.  

NOAA releases an annual report that records extreme events and explains how much of a role climate change played in each event. The trend is not hopeful.

2017 was a bad year for weather. We should strap ourselves in for more of the same. Or worse.


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from snow (Kraken 42nd / YouTube).

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

10 responses to “Massive Erie Snow Dump Facilitated by Climate Change”

  1. Big Tim says:

    “With all of the Arctic air streaming across the Great Lakes in the last week of 2017 and the first week of 2018, it set up the perfect conditions for a quick freeze-up over Lake Erie. Shortly after the Christmas holiday, forecasters in the National Weather Service office in Buffalo were saying that there was a good chance that they could see Lake Erie completely freeze over before the end of 2017. If so, that would have been the first time the lake had done so in 17 years.”
    Doesn’t your “expert” claim that the lake is usually frozen by that time, the time of the colossal snow storm? He admits the air was cold but blames the snow on the lake not being frozen, which he blames on climate change. Is Jake Crouch lying or just stupid?

  2. spearman says:

    The “polar vortex” is a real meteorlogical phenomena & not just a popular catch phrase. Less ice at the North Pole decreases atmospheric pressure at the pole & allows the circumpolar vortex (jet stream) to slip south allowing extended periods of cold all the way to the Gulf Coast.

  3. icthelite says:

    You never hear the media bring up the fact that the western Pacific is in a La Nina stage. This plays a big part on winters across to northern part of the nation.

  4. Mik says:

    It’s called Climate Change. Extreme Climate change. But who cares what that idiot Trump says? Focus on intelligent people, and get them to take steps to reduce carbon emissions.

    • icthelite says:

      So, what if all carbon emissions are controlled to the satisfaction of those saying it’s a problem?

    • straight shooter says:

      In reality, most of the extreme weather is man-made all right–but NOT from your exhaust pipe. Rather, it is from very complex geo-engineering.

  5. tz says:

    Hey, send that cold and snow here to the Colorado mountains. We are way below average for snow depth right now. The first decent storm hit Christmas eve. The day after Christmas the temps climbed up to snow softening and melting temps by day and have been there daily ever since.
    The nearby Denver water reservoir has always frozen over by mid-late December. It is now nowhere near freezing over here on 12/31. It was too warm for much of the past two months for man made snow to be produced by the ski areas. We got lots of that “good ol global warming”.Yup Mr Trump come here to feel it.

  6. Max Mogren says:

    Geoengineering is genocide. Chemical trails from aviation and wireless EMR manipulation of the atmosphere and ionosphere cause climate change at least on par with CO2, but probably above and beyond.

    • tz says:

      Got news for you, the chemicals left behind by airliners is water, CO2, a few unburned hydrocarbons, and some oxides of nitrogen.
      Can you provide a logical scientific explanation how EMR radiation alters the climate?

    • straight shooter says:

      Way above and beyond carbon. Carbon is a fairly nominal problem in the atmosphere, but has been used as propaganda to distract from the ionospheric assault going on–which is serious.