Voter Disenfranchisement in Florida Could Skew Swing State’s Outcome

Desmond Meade has a law degree from Florida International University. However, he is not allowed to practice law in the Sunshine State — and he cannot vote. That’s because Meade is an ex-felon and even though he has paid his debt to society, Florida is not yet done making him pay.

Instead of leaving Florida to practice law in another state, Meade now heads the Florida Restoration Project, which is trying to end the disenfranchisement of felons. The Sunshine State, which once again might decide the winner of a presidential election, is home to nearly 1.7 million current and former felons — the vast majority of whom will have no say in who will lead the country in the next four years.

“When you look at the number of individuals whose rights have been restored over the last six years, I mean, it’s depressing, considering 47 other states allow people to vote after they’ve served their time.”

While most states don’t allow incarcerated felons to vote, Florida is one of three states that also bars those felons from voting, even after they have served their sentence. In total, there are nearly six million disenfranchised felons in the country, according to a 2015 study conducted by the Sentencing Project, meaning that Florida is home to a quarter of them.

It should come as no surprise that African Americans and other minorities are disproportionately affected by this voter suppression effort.

Since Florida is once again expected to be a key state in this election with just a few thousand voters deciding the outcome, it is also apparent that these disenfranchised voters could probably have stopped Donald Trump from winning the state — and the presidency.

“The most telling [way voters are being suppressed in Florida] is the felon disenfranchisement policy,” Meade told WhoWhatWhy. He should know. Meade struggled as a youth. He had several run-ins with the law for minor infractions and was eventually convicted of felony possession of a firearm.

“When you look at the number of individuals whose rights have been restored over the last six years, I mean, it’s depressing, considering 47 other states allow people to vote after they’ve served their time.”

Meade is a great example of a felon who turned his life around. He attended Chapman Partnerships’ drug rehabilitation program and, upon completing it, went on to get his law degree. But he remains ineligible to vote.

Pamela Goodman, president of the Florida League of Women Voters, notes that there was a brief time when it looked as though the law would change. In 2007, steps were taken to automatically reinstate voting rights to most ex-felons, but Gov. Rick Scott blocked the effort when he took office in 2011.

While ex-felons can theoretically get their voting rights reinstated by applying for clemency, very few of these petitions have been approved under Scott’s aegis.

Jared A. Nordlund, Florida senior strategist at the National Council of La Raza, says that a significant reason for the high numbers of disenfranchised ex-felons in Florida does not have to do with provisions in the law itself, but rather in getting the governor and the clemency board to grant clemency for ex-felons after they have completed their sentences.

“If you’re a convicted felon and you’ve served your time and you’re eligible to become a part of the voting population again… basically the governor has to sign off on you being able to vote again,” Norlund said.

“When Charlie Crist was governor, he would have that clemency board go through a lot more [petitions] and restore rights. Under Governor Scott, it hasn’t been as many as that. It’s a process in Florida. It’s not an easy one for most people to go through to get their rights restored.”

Florida Governor Rick Scott Photo credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Florida Governor Rick Scott Photo credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Scott, a staunch Trump supporter, has taken other steps to ensure that the Republican candidate wins Florida. Last month, he refused to extend voter registration, which officially ended October 11, in the wake of Hurricane Matthew, which made it impossible for would-be voters to get to registration places for several days. The Florida Democratic Party filed a lawsuit against the governor for his decision; the date was later extended to October 18 by a federal judge.

Meade condemns the governor’s restrictive tactics.

“I think there’s a firm belief that a more inclusive democracy is a more vibrant democracy,” he said, adding that elected officials should institute policies that make voting as easy as possible for as many people as possible.

In two years, voters will get to decide if they want to re-elect Scott or replace him with somebody in favor of a more inclusive democracy. However, unless something changes drastically before then, the voices of those Floridians with the biggest stake in that election will, once again, go unheard.


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adopted by WhoWhatWhy from pavers (clive darra / Flickr – CC BY-SA 2.0) and sign (Amanda Wood / Flickr- CC BY-ND 2.0)

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

4 responses to “Voter Disenfranchisement in Florida Could Skew Swing State’s Outcome”

  1. 0040 says:

    Ric Scott should be in prison for enormous healthcare fraud against Medicare he made his fortune from. His company is still committing crimes in Fla using a mandatory drug testing law he enacted.. Vote rigging in Fla has been rampant since Reagan brought in the Batista Cubanos who replaced the resident black people in the service industry and drug trade. These immigrants were energetic and avaricious and now have a lot of input into Politics in that state – two of them actually running for POTUS at the outset of the sideshow called an election.

  2. David S says:

    While I certainly agree with the truth that once one’s debt to one’s VICTIM (not society) is paid, one should have ALL of their rights restored, why should that include the right to now vote for someone who will commit crimes against the citizens that would be illegal if done by the released felon? By that I mean the crimes of theft of money, theft of property, violation of personal liberties, etc. When criminal behavior can simply be “justified” by allowing a large group of people called “government” to engage in it, society as a whole is doomed. Think about that instead while you cast for your for the less of two evils.

  3. Paul Getty says:

    What a bunch of b.s. Disenfranchised? Don’t commit crimes, and you’ve got nothing to worry about. Quit your whining…

  4. Cochise says:

    You lose your rights by being convicted of a felony. So these “suppressed voters” are former convicted felons.