The Dirty Tricks of Election Thieves

Greg Palast
Greg Palast  Photo credit: Greg Palast / YouTube

Republican operatives have employed a series of “dubious practices” that will result in millions of eligible voters to be purged from the rolls ahead of the election, investigative reporter and filmmaker Greg Palast told WhoWhatWhy.

Among these tactics is the implementation of the “Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck Program” that is used in 30 GOP-controlled states. Its stated purpose is to make sure that voters are not registered in different states. Supposedly, a strict methodology is applied to guarantee that eligible voters are not inadvertently included.

However, Palast claims the program is being used to prevent millions of likely Democrats from voting. In his new film “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy,” he details the “scams” used to steal the 2016 presidential election.

One such tactic is the “middle name match” that supposes voters switch their middle name to vote twice. These assumed “double voters,” are usually minorities according to Palast.

“It has a racial tinge that is very discomforting,” he said.

Another technique Palast describes is the “junior” and “senior” form of voter suppression. Father and sons with the same last and first name — despite the ‘junior’ and ‘senior’ designation — are also on the suspicious voter list. Theoretically, that would mean that “George W. Bush Jr.” and “George H.W. Bush Senior” could be on the list. However, it is dominated by names of minorities, such as Hernandez, Kim or Mohamad.

In his interview with WhoWhatWhy, Palast also discusses the effects of overturning a key part of the Voting Rights Act, the New York primary voter purge, and other forms of voter suppression.

Greg Palast is an investigative reporter whose reporting has appeared in The Guardian, and Rolling Stone Magazine, and have aired on the BBC and Al Jazeera. He is best known in the US for uncovering Katherine Harris’s purge of black voters from Florida’s voter rolls in 2000. His new documentary claims that partisan efforts are underway to jeopardize the rights of voters.

—-

WWW: Hi my name is Daniel Engelke with WhoWhatWhy and we’re speaking today with Greg Palast about his new movie “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.” Greg, tell us a little about the film.

GP: “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy” is all about the upcoming 2016 election — which is a crime in process. However, hopefully the film can bust the election stealers before November. Over a million votes are at stake. There is a lot of talk about “voter suppression” of minority voters, but when your car is stolen, it is not called “car suppression,” it’s called “theft.” So part of the film is about how voter theft occurs. The other part is who conducts the theft. People know the name “Koch brothers,” but they probably are not aware of Paul “the Vulture” Singer. Or JP the “Foreclosure King.”

WWW: There has been a lifelong commitment to exposing fraud in your career. Most notably exposing Katherine Harris’s attempts to exclude minority voters in Florida during the 2000 election. What have you noticed after all these years? Are the tactics becoming more sophisticated? Or is the electorate getting dumber?

GP: In a way, yes to both. The tactics are getting worse and we are almost belligerently ignorant of the official mass heist of votes. 2000 looks like child’s play compared to what happens now. Now the tactic is “Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck Program.”

Crosschecking supposedly removes voters who are voting twice. So instead of arresting them — as voting fraud is a serious crime punishable by up to 5 years in jail — the people running Crosscheck are just removing voters from the rolls altogether. The list of these suspected fraudulent voters has over 7 million names.

“I heartily urge people to look up their registration. Don’t find out on Election Day that you’re ineligible. Every state and county allows voters to check their status online. It’s a simple way to defeat these systems.

WWW: How exactly does Crosschecking work? Shouldn’t the authorities crack down on so-called fraudulent or “Double Voters?”

GP: Of course they should. And they do — I’ve never heard of a judge not sentencing someone to jail for fraudulent voting. However, Crosschecking is not as sound as it may seem. Here is how it works:

Kris Kobach, Kansas Secretary of State  Photo credit:  Dept. of Justice / Wikimedia

Kris Kobach, Kansas Secretary of State  Photo credit:  Dept. of Justice / Wikimedia

In 30 Republican governed states, lists with suspected fraudulent voters are being sent to the Secretary of State in Kansas Kris Kobach. Kobach claims to check their birth dates, social security numbers, everything that could prove if someone voted twice. If they “match” anyone, that person loses the right to vote in the upcoming election in November. 7.2 million Americans are suspected of voting twice.

But Kobach is not doing exactly what he claims. The voters that are suspected are people like “Maria Christina Hernandez” who voted in Virginia and voted again, apparently, as “Maria Isabel Hernandez’’ in Georgia. So Kobach and those concerned with so-called voter fraud think that “Maria Hernandez” is an “uncommon name” and that she is just switching her middle name twice to vote in separate states. 2 million voters are suspected of middle name mismatches like the Hernandez example.

WWW: So that is 2 million people, which is not insignificant. But that is not 7.2 million. What’s another popular tactic?

GP: Hundreds of thousands are “junior” and “senior” mismatches — meaning there is suspicion that a father and son are the same person. So “George W. Bush Jr.” and “George H.W. Bush Senior” would be on the suspect list. But people with the last name of Bush are not on their list. It’s only names like “Hernandez,” “Kim” [an extremely common Korean surname], “Mohamed” [also spelled “Mohammed” as well as “Muhammad”]. In fact, “Mohamed Mohamed” is the most common name in the world, yet almost none of them have the same middle name.

So in Ohio, there was a case of “Mohamed Obaid Mohamed” and “Mohamed Oiasis Mohamed.”  Both these people lost their vote because they are suspected of fraudulent voting. That’s how it works.

WWW: Didn’t you confront Kobach?

GP:  Yes, I went deep into Koch country in Kansas to confront Kris Kobach. He actually dodged me for a year. So I found out he was going to be hosting an ice cream social fundraiser for the Republican Party. I put one of those local news cubes with the number “4” over my microphone and ran over to shake his hand.

One of my tactics when confronting people is to start by shaking their hand and then refusing to let go. I confronted Kobach with the voter roll list that he thought was still confidential — he didn’t know that Virginia had accidentally sent us the list of suspected fraudulent voters. He refused to admit that the Crosscheck — that focused on the middle names catch of Maria Christina Hernandez and Maria Isabel Hernandez — could be part of his lists. That was impossible, according to him.

This system flagged 41,000 voters in Virginia. In Ohio, just short of half a million. In North Carolina, it’s a quarter million. All using the same tactics that we spoke about. So Kobach ran away. He did, however, call me a year later to admit the names could be on the list, but said “we didn’t tell states they had to purge these voters from their polls.” Uh-huh.

WWW: Greg, this actually isn’t the only person you confront in the film. You actually sneak into a VIP party in the Hamptons to speak with Paul “The Vulture” Singer. That looked a little rough. How did you escape unscathed?

GP:  Well, fending off old people riots at ice cream socials is not as hard as one may think. Plus, working for news outlets like the BBC and Rolling Stone allows me a certain standard of security. Yet it is really my sources that are the courageous ones. Especially the ones in third-world countries.

These people are at serious risk when they give information. In Tanzania, a lawyer named Tundu Lissu really risked his life for me. George H.W. Bush was working with a private gold mining company in the country that was, in a word, bulldozing land when people were still down in the mines. There were literally independent miners — who had legal claim stakes to the land — being bulldozed over. Lissu wanted to go public with this information and thus told me. He was charged with sedition by the government and his law partner, who was an MP in the government, was beaten up. Their law office was also destroyed. It’s not me that’s in danger, it’s my sources.

WWW: You also mention the “Inactive” Voter phenomenon in the film. Didn’t we see something about that in the NYC Primary vote?

GP: That’s another one of the scams. It’s the catchall way to knock off voters under federal law. In Brooklyn, 126,000 people showed up to vote but found out they couldn’t because they were deemed “inactive” voters. So they were given something called a provisional ballot, or affidavit ballots in New York. Voters are deemed “inactive” if they missed either one or two federal elections — a presidential or midterm. So they’re given an affidavit ballot under the promise that the person voting is actually who they say they are. In the old days, these affidavit ballots were counted. Now they are stuck in an envelope and thrown away.

The system is a catch-22. You can’t receive a normal ballot if you’re not registered, yet an affidavit ballot won’t count if you’re not registered. Two million affidavit ballots were thrown out in the last election. This year it’s going to be 3 to 6 million.

WWW: Is there anything that didn’t make it into the film?

GP: One of the things I was so sorry to take out was something that occurred right after the Voting Rights Act was overturned in 2013. Within hours after the decision, Alabama passed a law that said voters had to have a state-issued ID from the Department of Motor Vehicles. This means a driver’s license or non-driver’s license — a real task for someone in rural Alabama who can’t drive to the DMV.

But that’s nothing. What the state did was to close every DMV in what they call the ten “Black Belt” counties — as you can guess, these are primarily African-American counties. So not only could voters not get the ID, they couldn’t even get the forms.

However, Alabama has state-run liquor stores which of course stayed open. We went to one of these state-run liquor stores and asked for voter forms. They wouldn’t give us the forms, but we did get a nice bottle of Jack Daniels. So in Alabama you can get booze from the State, but not ballots.

WWW: What do you think is the most egregious example of voter suppression?

GP:  Well, they are all pretty nasty, but especially Crosscheck. However, there are also others. For example, Voter Caging was a pretty bad scam. Karl Rove and the Republican Party used to send out voter documents to minority soldiers stationed abroad and students during summer recess. When the documents came back as “undeliverable,” Rove and Republicans would claim this was proof these of fraudulent voters and those voters would be knocked off the rolls. There would be 50 letters addressed to “Naval Air Base” in Jacksonville, Florida and there were claims that it was a fake address because soldiers are supposed to vote from their Army Post Office (APO) rather than the base their stationed at.

WWW: Do you think this happens on the Democrat side?

GP:  Well, I certainly think that if there were less shenanigans like we saw in NYC and California, there would be a different Democratic party. Thus, the Democratic party does not fight very hard for the so-called right to vote. They know if everyone were allowed to vote, a lot of incumbents would lose their seat. The Democrats are silently complicit in vote theft, if not active.

WWW: Last question: Can the public save this election or is it already lost?

GP: We can absolutely save this election. Remember when we talked about voter caging? When I broke the story on British television, the ACLU went in and blocked the Republican Party from continuing the scheme.

Making these things public, especially things like Crosscheck, is extremely valuable. Especially because Crosscheck is happening mostly in places with tight Senate races — Arizona, New Hampshire, Ohio, North Carolina. Don’t believe this is some coincidence.

Also, I heartily urge people to look up their registration. Don’t find out on Election Day that you’re ineligible. Every state and county allows voters to check their status online. It’s a simple way to defeat these systems.

From WhoWhatWhy: To see a teaser for “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy,” please go here.


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from The Best Democracy Money Can Buy (Greg Palast / YouTube)

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

15 responses to “The Dirty Tricks of Election Thieves”

  1. Kat Snow says:

    America needs to say this is not OK.
    But America is divided. 87% of Trump supporters believe everything he says & refuse to change the channel. How can we as a country come together and say this is not OK, every vote should matter.
    They conducted a poll/survey on what Trump supporters believe & the results where absolutely disturbing on every single level. History, undeniable facts are being ignored for Trumps out right lies. What has happened to our country? How can we raise children like this? Do we teach equality and compassion? While others teach fear & only Trump? Or should we be more concerned with them defending themselves.? They are going to live in the scariest time in American history.

  2. soctal says:

    No,your sentence is painted with a broad brush. This article is objective journalism at its best.

  3. soctal says:

    1. The number of people who voted was very high, he won in comfortable enough numbers to override the voter purging, BUT the GOP have been able to swipe Senator seats and Governorships and other down-ballot races and proposals.

    2. Enough white voters voted for Obama. The GOP wont risk suppressing white votes. Black votes are especially targeted because they consistently vote Democratic in high numbers.

  4. Bleepin Liberal says:

    What I want to know is … how did President Obama get elected twice, since it seems election fraud has been so prevalent in recent elections.

  5. 4tens says:

    Article is painted with a broad brush. Objective Journalism does not exist.

  6. Gizmo says:

    I’m glad that the election integrity issue is finally coming to the forefront. A whole lot of people are now conscious that something is amiss, which is a good thing. There may be some confusion and unreliable information out there, but at least EI is on the radar, thanks largely to the Internet. If we had to rely on Big Media to cover this story, we’d continue to be in the dark.

  7. Virginia Martin says:

    Speaking to what happens in New York State: Inactivating voters doesn’t work as described, nor are all affidavit ballots thrown out. A voter is inactivated if the Board of Elections learns that the voter no longer lives at her/his registered address. This generally occurs after an official non-forwardable mailer that the board has sent to the voter has been returned because the voter no longer lives at the registered address. (This is an annual mailing, mandated by law, to all registered voters.)

    When that occurs, the voter is inactivated and mailed a card that the post office can forward to any new address the PO may have. The card explains that the voter has been inactivated and asks her to contact the board to clarify her residence status.

    If that voter does not return that card, or contact the board in any manner, and does not try to vote in two subsequent federal elections, the voter is cancelled.

    But, if that voter contacts the board any time during that period of time to clarify her residence status, her registration would be activated, if appropriate. Also, if that voter does try to vote in any election, she would be offered an affidavit ballot. When the ballot is subsequently reviewed by the board, if it is determined that the voter is in inactive status and still lives in the county (and, in a primary, is enrolled in the party in question), then the vote is counted, and the voter is activated.

    This is very different to the explanation that Mr. Palast provided. It’s a good process. It’s very distressing that there is so much confusion about it, and I don’t understand why that is.

  8. MacKenzie says:

    If I may offer some constructive criticism, I would rate this article as “incomplete”. Several questions:

    I haven’t seen the film yet but I’m wondering if it’s only Republicans doing this type of voter fraud (or if there’s an equivalent in the Democrat party).

    Also, have any studies been done showing the amount of vote fraud in counties (or states) with the various types of checks? It certainly doesn’t sound unreasonable (to me, at least) to have some type of verification method in place.

    The article mentions the difficulty people in rural Alabama have getting to the DMV. I feel like this is an incomplete point. How do these people fly on planes? And if they live in a rural area, how do they get to their nearest voting area? And how many voters live in such rural areas that they’d be affected by these types of rules? Obviously no system is going to be perfect but we’d need stats to make judgments.

    Also, does Palast have suggestions for how to have a legitimate check of ID without it being biased against people/groups? Eliminating verification would (or at least could) lead to widespread vote fraud.

    • Virginia Martin says:

      How do these people fly on planes? You’re assuming that everyone flies? That everyone has the resources to buy a plane ticket?

  9. Marko says:

    Even if every single eligible voter was allowed to vote , the election may still be stolen. Without integrity in the vote-counting process , the right to vote is half-a-loaf. Less than half , really.

    Our election process is rigged , top-to-bottom , start-to-finish , from the pre-election polls , to the debates , to voter suppression , to election fraud , to the exit polls. Not to mention the DNC and RNC party machinery.

    We are in hair-on-fire election crisis mode , and the official response has been a collective yawn.

    • dex3703 says:

      Of course it’s a collective yawn. It’s not a crisis from their point of view. It’s working as intended. The elections are only to provide a patina of legitimacy, giving the impression the public has a say.

      As Stalin said, what matters is who counts the votes.

    • Marko says:

      You’re right , of course. Still , I’ve assumed that we’ve always had at least a handful of principled people in positions of power , like Bernie Sanders , for example. Yet we rarely hear a peep about this even from them. Maybe the potential repercussions are just too frightening for them to risk making waves.

      We may be truly stuck with this mess.

    • dex3703 says:

      I would guess that’s so. There’s no way to tell if anybody won anything. I notice Debbie Wasserman Schultz just “won” reelection. Really?

    • Virginia Martin says:

      1. Use paper ballots.
      2. Keep them secure (in a manner that the public has confidence in) until the election is certified.
      3. If ballot-scanners are used, employ a robust hand-count audit (like a risk-limiting audit) and invite the public to watch it closely.
      4. Provide a means by which the audit can be escalated by a candidate, a party, or the public.
      5. Give the public all the tools it needs so it can know not only how the votes were counted but that the ballots were completely secure the entire time.
      6. Certify the election only after these steps have been taken.

    • Marko says:

      I agree , that’s what we need. How to get it done across the country by Nov. 8 is the big problem.

      Going back to paper ballots which are counted properly would upset decades of careful work by TPTB to give us elections that they can rig. They’ll fight it to the death in all the places where it would be important. I don’t think the courts are going to save us. There are multiple election fraud lawsuits pending now that will most likely amount to squat , if history is any guide.

      Having the means to escalate a vote audit ( your point #4 ) would seem like an absolute requirement of any decent electoral system. So should be the means to challenge and change the entirety of the voting system when it’s as obviously flawed as it is in most states today. That these means are often not readily accessible to voters is not a bug , it’s a feature , IMO.