EXCLUSIVE: The Counterinsurgency War on—and Inside—Our Borders - WhoWhatWhy

EXCLUSIVE: The Counterinsurgency War on—and Inside—Our Borders

Reading Time: 5 minutes
Blurred Lines: A Mexican military chopper in U.S. airspace, photographed by Texas park rangers. Courtesy of WikiLeaks

Blurred Lines: A Mexican military chopper in U.S. airspace, photographed by Texas park rangers. Courtesy of WikiLeaks

The Mexican police helicopter that flew into Arizona last month and fired shots near U.S. Border Patrol agents was no fluke—such incursions have become so frequent they amount to an internationalized shooting war along our southern border.

It’s not just Mexican police helicopters; Mexican military aircraft entered U.S. territory 49 times from 2010 through 2012. That’s according to a Customs and Border Protection list acquired through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request made by WhoWhatWhy.

Along with other documents obtained independently by WikiLeaks, the recent incidents confirm that the U.S. has been taking a full-bore counterinsurgency approach to the border drug war. The possibility that was happening is something we told you about earlier.

Official statements and media reports about the Arizona incident have not come close to explaining the real significance of such cross-border operations. The facts are now clear: the Pentagon’s push to use counterinsurgency tactics against drug traffickers is giving Mexican armed forces the leeway to operate in the airspace above U.S. territory.


Specific Mexican military helicopter incursions and near-incursions are detailed in intelligence reports obtained by WikiLeaks and assessed by WhoWhatWhy. The reports were created by the Border Security Operations Center, an Austin nerve center run by the Texas state police that oversees hundreds of intelligence analysts and manages untold surveillance cameras. The reports came to WikiLeaks after hackers broke into the servers of private intelligence firm Stratfor, which got the documents from its sources.

These revelations about the extent of the cross-border war on drugs are the latest fruit of our investigative partnership with WikiLeaks to carefully assess selected documents from its vast trove. (Take a look at our earlier collaborations with the whistleblower group here and here.)  

The Rio Grande Firefight

As the Pentagon faces sequestration funding cuts and a fighting force exhausted from Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. military is relying more and more on foreign armed forces, police and private contractors like Stratfor.

The close cooperation between U.S. and Mexican forces against drug traffickers follows from modern counterinsurgency strategy, which dictates that police should function like soldiers when necessary to deny funds to whichever rebels—or drug cartels—are out of favor.

This approach is on display in part of a report published by the Austin center on May 6, 2011. The document is marked “Law Enforcement Sensitive.” This means it was intended for law enforcement eyes only, according to intelligence analyst Kendra Miller. She was a contact point for those seeking access to the reports. [Email-ID 1966867, May 9, 2011]

The document describes a firefight about 30 miles from McAllen, Texas, during which a police chopper from that state provided targeting assistance to the Mexican military as an alleged drug smuggler was killed. It includes this photograph of a Mexican Air Force chopper flying above the Rio Grande:

CaptureThis apparent incursion, or near-incursion, was not included on the Customs and Border Protection list we obtained in response to our Freedom of Information request – indicating that Mexican military operations along the U.S. border are even more numerous than the FOIA document suggests.

It’s not clear if that Mexican chopper flew into U.S. airspace. But there’s no doubt the Americans took part in the gun battle, because the Texas state police helicopter guided the Mexican chopper and ground forces to the suspects, including one who was hiding in the brush.

Here’s what happened to him:

BOSA_6May2011_Page60(If you want to read the full account of the pursuit and firefight in the Border Operations report for yourself, take a look here or at the following excerpt, which we’ve annotated for easier understanding.)

[box] USBP [Border Patrol] Agents, assisted by DPS Air 108 [a Texas state police helicopter], pursued a [narco] vehicle near La Grulla[, Texas] that was throwing homemade spikes [caltrops] at the pursuit vehicles traveling against traffic on US-83 before turning south towards the Rio Grande. The vehicle was able to travel to the Rio Grande where bundles [presumably containing illegally trafficked narcotics] were taken from the vehicle and loaded into a jon [flat-bottomed] boat [that] returned to Mexico.

The [Texas police] Aircrew arrived at the river and observed a maroon F-250 [Ford pickup truck], a white pickup and [a] green SUV parked on the Mexican side, with a jon boat on the Mexican side [of] the bank and nearly 40 DTO [Drug Trafficking Organization—cartel] members. USBP advised the Government of Mexico and were notified that they were sending the Military to the area.BOSA_6May2011_Page59

All vehicles left the Mexican side traveling south when Mexican Military attempted to engage and reported [that] caltrops thrown from the vehicles disabled some of the Mexican Military vehicles. The Aircrew returned to the jon boats and observed the boats traveling down river and met the original maroon Ford F-250 pickup. While DPS Air 108 was observing the jon boat, another jon boat arrived at the same location. The first boat left traveling up river and met other suspects.

The Mexican Military in helicopter and ground units were guided to the location as DPS Air 108 advised where the suspects were located. The Mexican Military then engaged the suspects and a gun battle ensued with several suspects struck by Mexican Military fire. One suspect was taken into custody.

DPS Air 108 was able to make radio contact with the Mexican Military Helicopter guiding the helicopter and ground units to the last known location of a suspect hiding in the brush.[/box]

Three days before the report was published, Stratfor’s Fred Burton was telling his colleagues a whole lot more about that dead body. His e-mail included three photos that later appeared in the intelligence report, taken from the U.S. side of the border. He described the suspect as “Killed in action.”  [Email-ID 1359232, May 3, 2011] 

Private Spies’ Inside Knowledge

Stratfor analyst Korena Zucha assumed the Mexican military helicopter had flown into American airspace, and asked Burton whether it was normal for Mexican forces to operate in U.S. territory.

“All the time, we fly our birds into (Mexico) and vice versa. Don’t tell Alex Jones or Glenn Beck. The (Customs and Border Patrol) do not fly after dark or weekends,” Burton responded.

The re-imagining of the U.S.-Mexico border drug war as a counter-insurgency operation has proved to be a post-9/11 bonanza for private spies like Stratfor and other contractors.

Stratfor, for much of the period covered by the WikiLeaks cache (2004-2011), was plugged into restricted knowledge from government intelligence entities in Texas, including the Drug Enforcement Administration’s El Paso Intelligence Center and the Austin center.

The career of Fred Burton, Stratfor’s expert on Mexican drug cartels, exemplifies the revolving door between government security agencies and private security contractors that has become the norm since the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in 2002.

Before Stratfor, Burton spent more than a decade at the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service, reading floods of cables describing threats against embassies worldwide. And now, he’s getting law enforcement information before a lot of the law enforcement community.

The counterinsurgency campaign is unquestionably erasing the lines between law enforcement and the military—and even countries. With what amounts to a low-level, unacknowledged war being fought on America’s doorstep, sorting out the tangled interests in play—including whether the public truly benefits—seems a high priority.

THUMBNAIL: Mexican Military Helicopter Over U.S. Soil

[box] WhoWhatWhy plans to continue doing this kind of groundbreaking original reporting. You can count on us. Can we count on you? What we do is only possible with your support.

Please click here to donate; it’s tax deductible. And it packs a punch.[/box]

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


13 responses to “EXCLUSIVE: The Counterinsurgency War on—and Inside—Our Borders”

  1. Title

    […]we came across a cool web-site which you could possibly take pleasure in. Take a search in the event you want[…]

  2. Avatar Buzzy says:

    I find this encouraging: many of the right-wing political persuasion have decried Wikileaks as being anti-American and treasonous for their whistleblowing (though I can’t understand how a Brit can legally be guilty of treason when exposing U.S. corruption while being outside of this country). It is time to lose the phony liberal vs .conservative political debate which is carefully crafted artifice designed to keep fellow citizens at each others’ throats, rather than recognize the common domestic enemy. The Tea Party blames the government for its abuses (which it IS guilty of); the Occupy Wall Street folks blame the banks (which ARE guilty of major fraud, abuse and the corruption of our government through co-optation). To get a real story, one must seek sources of information that are not mainstream and corporately owned. Republican or Democrat, it makes no difference– most of both have sold us down the river. All of it serves the military-industrial complex that Ike warned us about; the entire construct is a lie.

  3. Avatar luis says:

    I wonder how many times have US aircraft (non civilian) gone into Mexican airspace?
    I remember reading reports years ago about US drones crossing into Mexican airspace, but never of full-blown helicopters.

  4. Avatar nick says:

    The people who write our history will blur all of this 200 years from now and make Obama a savior of refugees, because that’s what we let them do. We go to government schools and get taught garbage at a snail’s pace. Why are we even trying?

  5. Avatar Rick says:

    War on drugs + War on terror = War on American people & sovereignty!

  6. Avatar EL GABACHO LOCO says:


  7. Avatar ExpatMatt says:

    Incisive as ever, Mr. Lucas. It’s nice to see the tradition of investigative journalists like Carl Bernstein is not totally dead, and it’s significant that Wikileaks’ huge cache of documents are being used to fill in world geopolitical gaps, instead of sitting in a server somewhere. Respect to you, WhoWhatWhy and Wikileaks for these efforts.

    Well done, and keep it up. Gotta have an informed populace to have a democracy that actually IS the “worst, except for all the rest.”

    To paraphrase and expand upon something I read once, the story of the 21st century could easily be the final blurring of the boundaries between war, crime, politics, and business.

  8. Avatar Aelius says:

    As if the “war on drugs” wasn’t disturbing enough, the escalating militarism like this is seriously chilling. And the fact that it’s largely radio silence in the media, except for the occasional, noticeable “fluke”, is all the more worrying. Whether it is warranted or not, the use of military force on both side of the border is definitely something we should keep a critical eye on. Accountability is always an early casualty of war, and the drug war got rid of that early on…..

  9. Avatar Gary Brad Anderson says:

    I think the last sentence is key — does the public benefit? Like many, I’m of the opinion that 90% of the war on drugs is pointless and the overall ‘cure’ is way worse than the disease; but if you’re going to actually fight the damn thing, what are the implications for doing it this way? So long as the incursions into US Territory are restricted to the wasteland around the border, does it really matter?

  10. Avatar Gordon Phinn says:

    Thanks for this. The very telling quote for me is, “Don’t tell Glenn Beck or Alex Jones”. I mean, really.

  11. Avatar DamOTclese2 says:

    Insane conspiracy lunacy.

    • Avatar Gary Brad Anderson says:

      What’s the conspiracy, exactly?

    • Avatar ExpatMatt says:

      This article? You understand what ‘facts’ and ‘research’ are, right? Mr. Lucas is getting this information from the US Gov’t. What’s the conspiracy? Where’s the lunacy? Just cuz…what, it’s not on CNN, it didn’t happen, and damn all evidence?