Trump’s U-Turn on Family Separation

Kirstjen Nielsen, Donald Trump, Mike Pence
President Donald J. Trump signs an executive order "affording Congress an opportunity to address family separation, June 20, 2018." Photo credit: The White House / YouTube
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Caving to sustained uproar from activists and politicians worldwide, President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday to end the separation of children and parents who illegally traverse the US-Mexico border. Far from an act of mercy, though, this corrective mainly serves to keep intact a morally indefensible policy.

It is, in fact, the first time Trump has backtracked on an incendiary, legally-contested measure to combat illegal immigration, one of the signature issues of his 2016 presidential campaign. Buoyed by GOP hardliners, he made significant strides on the immigration front in his first year in office, passing a travel ban targeting people from Muslim-majority countries and repealing the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which shielded from deportation a million undocumented minors.

Then in April, Attorney General Jeff Sessions rolled out a “zero-tolerance” policy toward unauthorized border-crossings. Under the policy, border patrol agents will criminally prosecute every adult who illegally walks into the US from Mexico.

However, a 1997 court order, called the Flores agreement, forbids immigration officials from holding minors for longer than 20 days. This limitation ripped families apart: Parents must remain in detention as long as their cases are deliberated, but Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are obligated to immediately release children to the care of relatives or a licensed program. (The Justice Department is seeking to change the law so that ICE can gain indefinite custody of alien families.)

While detained parents awaited criminal proceedings in jail, children were placed in Border Patrol facilities or foster homes. Photos of children kept in cages went viral last weekend, fueling a wave of public backlash that pressured Trump to release the executive order, which requires families to be detained together. Assigned to the same facilities and under more humane conditions, children can be spared the pain and trauma of separation.

But the order does not reverse the initial policy, and the administration made clear that it will continue to detain unauthorized border-crossers. It also fails to address whether, or how, the 2,300 minors already affected by the policy will be reunited with their parents. If implemented, the new rules pose daunting financial challenges, as substantially more infrastructure will be needed to facilitate long-term detention of entire families.

“This executive order would replace one crisis for another,” said Anthony Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “Children don’t belong in jail at all, even with their parents, under any set of circumstances.”

Watch the videos below for a closer look at the traumatic conditions detained children endured without their parents.


Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from border wall (Nofx221984 / Wikimedia).

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

print

One response to “Trump’s U-Turn on Family Separation”

  1. jeff nies says:

    As has been widely not explained, whatever order Trump signed last week allegedly reversing the zero tolerance border enforcement policy federal authorities were operating under in screening and separating families, Trump’s change of mind means nothing with no plan behind it to reunite families and continue with zero tolerance.

    The real problem, of course, is buried within the process of detention of families as it relates to enforcing deportation and due process of border crossing violators. Because Border Patrol enforce the borders but isn’t equipped, designed or licensed to detain violators, which they routinely turn over to DHS and related agencies for care before court adjudication. And because of limited resources, housing and legal detention limits, those agencies must rely on private contractors for services nationwide for these services, which explains why so many kids are being shipped around the country now to places far from their original capture and family separation.

    Because prior administrations never fixed this administrative loophole in policy enforcement, they decided it made no sense to treat every illegal crossing as a felony. In the Trump administration’s case, the policy enforcement isn’t so much a response to changing conditions at the border, as it is a need to find a suitable midterm campaign issue to exploit in support of the Trump party agenda.

    The policy stance, though overly costly and taxing regular border control resources to meet political demands, gaslights an age old problem that Trump’s administrative agents can stand behind and assuredly support with total confidence that they are only following as all-American leaders. Border control is not a black and white issue. It’s not about building a wall to keep the non-white riff raff out or preventing the good, bad and the ugly from occurring along the southwest border. It is about stirring up Trump’s base with no other emotional argument at hand other than a referendum on Trumpland to court the Red state vote in November.