Confederate Monuments: History Lessons or Symbols of White Supremacy?

Confederate Monument
Closeup of Confederate monument at University of Louisville, Belknap campus. Dedicated in 1895. Photo credit: Louisville Images / Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The movement to unmoor Confederate monuments gained momentum in 2015, when self-proclaimed white supremacist Dylan Roof posed with a Confederate flag and murdered nine African Americans in a Charleston, SC, church. Activists and politicians worked together to take down the flag in the state and abolish other reminders of hate and bigotry in the South.

Claiming that the movement to remove Confederate monuments is an assault on the country’s heritage and culture, alt-right groups have used the issue to increase their ranks and promote their message of white supremacy. They received a boost from the election of President Donald Trump, who not only refused to single out extremists for inciting the violence in Charlottesville, VA last week, but also falsely accused counter-protesters of violently “charging in without a permit.”

Ironically, but maybe not surprisingly, calls to dismantle more monuments have increased since Saturday’s rally — which came to a head when one of the white supremacists drove his car into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing one woman and injuring 19 others.

Baltimore was the first to act, moving to dismantle statues of Lee and his fellow Confederate General Stonewall Jackson.

The reactions were as polarizing as could be expected. Maine Governor Paul LePage said that razing a Confederate monument is like razing a tribute to a 9/11 victim.

But descendants of memorialized Confederate leaders advocated for the relocation or removal of their ancestors’ statues, so the country “can heal.”

Both the tragedy in Charlottesville and the ongoing battle over the preservation of Confederate historical monuments — perceived symbols of white supremacy — point to a growing rift between the ways different racial groups view America’s past. With more than 700 markers left, that rift isn’t likely to shrink.

The majority of Confederate monuments were built between the 1890s and 1960s, which happens to coincide with the establishment of Jim Crow. The statues were often erected during periods in which the South was sharply resisting political rights for African Americans.

History reminders, or white supremacy propaganda?

Click on the videos below to discover some of the more nuanced arguments for and against the removal of Confederate statues.

Related front page panorama photo credit: Adapted by WhoWhatWhy from Stone Mountain Memorial (Peter Kaminski / Flickr – CC BY 2.0).

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


2 responses to “Confederate Monuments: History Lessons or Symbols of White Supremacy?”

  1. Jeff Grotke says:

    The question is not one of just principle, but scope. I live in the inland empire, where we have roughly about a million more people than Mississippi. We have three or four statues that I can think of, one is of Martin Luther King. Two others were not political. We don’t have a single statue of any civil war figure, of any kind. By comparison, Mississippi has over 100 statues in PUBLIC places…or by population, the equivalent of 150 if they were here. I can’t even imagine 150 statues in the inland empire, California. They could be statues of JFK and it would still be so prevalent as to be obnoxious. For a black person, to see this many statues of persons who committed themselves to keeping slavery, it must be obviously annoying, not to mention that tax dollars must be used, obviously to preserve, maintain and protect these sculptures, many of which are quite beautiful. Put them in cemeteries, put them in museums where they belong. Leave one or two, but end what is obviously an attempt to annoy, intimidate, and harass black citizens. What would Jews think after all, if every corner in Berlin had a statue of some Nazi general?