RUSSRANT: Forbidden Topic: Did Voter Suppression Elect Trump?

Voting rights
50th anniversary unofficial March on Washington protest. Photo credit: Lauren Shiplett / Flickr (CC BY 2.0).
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Hillary Clinton’s lead in the popular vote now exceeds two million. But she lost the Electoral College fair and square. Or did she?

Did a hideous and undemocratic effort to prevent some Americans from voting result in Donald Trump’s electoral college win? Does it explain, at least in part, how generally accurate polls could have been so wildly off?

That’s exactly what the evidence suggests. Yet almost no one in the media wants to talk about this.

As a result, we see yet another abdication by journalism.

This kind of thing should be of concern to all fair-minded people, irrespective of which candidate they preferred. Cheating — and that’s what it would have been — is profoundly un-American. And cheating will only justify more cheating. It will be a deadly cycle for democracy.


It’s unclear why the media is giving this issue short shrift. It’s certainly not as sexy as Donald Trump talking about sexually assaulting women or Hillary Clinton’s emails, but the real reason might be that the media allowed this to happen.

For years, Republican-controlled states have been doing all they can to ensure an electorate that is favorable to its candidates. In other words, they have tried to put in place measures that make it as difficult as legally possible for minorities to vote.

The laws they passed include the elimination of early voting opportunities that Democrats have traditionally taken advantage of (e.g. the elimination of Golden Week in Ohio and same-day registration in North Carolina), preventing ex-felons from voting (this affects more than 1.5 million people in Florida alone), closing hundreds of polling locations throughout the country (e.g. 403 in Texas and 212 in Arizona), new Voter ID rules (minorities are less likely to own the required IDs or to be able to obtain them), and voter purges across the country) in states like Wisconsin.

For example, the Crosscheck system applied in Republican states resulted in hundreds of thousands of potential voters being kicked off the rolls – often because their name is similar to that of another voter registered elsewhere.

Much of this was done under the guise of preventing in-person voter fraud, which is pretty much a non-existent crime.

Voting Rights

NAACP march for voting rights in midtown Manhattan, December 10, 2011. Photo credit: Michael Fleshman / Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0).

It is nearly impossible to tell how many voters stayed home because of new rules. The total number could be enormous. Yes, there is only anecdotal evidence of people being turned away at their polling station because they did not have the proper form of ID, but…

How many people never found the time to get it in the first place or lacked the documents needed?

How many families voted early following church on a Sunday but did not because that opportunity was eliminated?

How many low-income Americans didn’t vote because they had to work two jobs on Election Day and couldn’t afford to stand in a long line because polling stations had been closed?

How many children of illegal immigrants did not dare to show up because they were worried that their loved ones would get deported?

Courts stopped some of these undemocratic methods but many of them withstood review. In other words, Republicans found a way to legally accomplish the same thing both parties always accuse each other of: They rigged the election.

WhoWhatWhy covered many of these topics much more extensively than much larger media outlets. It must also be noted that the stories we ran did not turn out to be among our most popular articles. People were just too enamored of the more “fun” and less “dry” aspects of the campaign — the personalities and the “horse race.”

That’s very, very bad. We can point fingers in many directions. But more important than the blame is the simple fact: In a democracy, the government should make it as easy as possible for people to cast their votes.

This year, those who assail government were able to turn those they do not like — or with whom they do not agree — into second-class citizens.

The US seems to be the only western democracy to have these problems. Yet many solid solutions present themselves, including:automatic voter registration, uniform voting laws across the country, and making Election Day a holiday or always scheduling it for weekends. Let’s hear your ideas in the comments section below.


Additional Reading and Watching:

Rigging the Election Legally, the GOP Way

When Election Insanity Met Better Media

Will Virginia’s Voter Suppression Put Trump in the White House?

Where else do you see journalism of this quality and value?

Please help us do more. Make a tax-deductible contribution now.

Our Comment Policy

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.


10 responses to “RUSSRANT: Forbidden Topic: Did Voter Suppression Elect Trump?”

  1. Cedrik Thibert says:

    If voter suppression is even part of the deal, it’s a serious reason to question the legitimacy of an election.

    Voter supression is illegal and against the US Constitution.

  2. Robert Riley says:

    The US has no “problems” with its voting systems–the powers that be like it that way!

  3. ShirlB says:

    One person has been covering this issue for years: investigative journalist Greg Palast. He’s just not invited to appear on MSM outlets or featured in the WP, NYT, or WSJ. He is the expert and has been called in by some officials to attempt to right the wrongs perpetrated in this election. I suggest inviting him on for an interview with Jeff and also linking to his site. BTW, George W. Bush stole both elections by slightly different tactics, the most egregious being sending GOP congressional staffers to Florida to shut down the vote count with brown shirt tactics. Three electoral coups are more than enough.

  4. 0040 says:

    Disagree. Voting should be hard and require a demonstrable understanding of the issues. America’s founding documents got that right. Only educated men with property were allowed to vote, removing much the demagoguery that ensued when the franchise was “given” to the masses – of whom over 50% still do not vote. Letting slaves, women, and foreigners vote and hold high office has brought down several western empires, Rome and Britain among them. It appears America is quickly going down that path as well. Starting with the likes Kissinger, Albright, and Brzezinski, and worsening as time passes. I suspect Trump is giggling himself to sleep these nights as faux left/far right heads explode when he, with great earnestness, calls several Brahman caste Indian princes, who were former enemies, in for cabinet level job interviews.

    • Jeff Clyburn says:

      Yeah, letting non-white men vote was not what brought the slow decline of the British Empire. Sorry. …. And, if the people were required to have a “demonstrable understanding of the issues” in order to vote, the GOP would lose in a landslide every time.

    • Robert Riley says:

      Incredibly wrong-headed.

    • Cedrik Thibert says:

      If you want voting to be hard, you are promoting a dictatorial regime where only a select few are able to decide on who runs the lives of millions, usually those selected few are those very same politicians voting themselves in and offering gifts to themselves. You want USA to be transformed into Communist China or something where only the Elite of the Communist Party can vote? What kind of horrible political system are you proposing for America? Every citizen should have a voice.

    • 0040 says:

      Not at all I’m supporting global population reductions and education as primary goal of governance. The 50% of Americans that did not vote also made a choice ?

    • J. D'Haule says:

      LOL. What’s wrong with letting someone who pays no tax, appropriates wealth from others via the government, expects to be insulated of any responsibility for their own irresponsibility, and can barely communicate on a 6th grade level vote? And how egregious to expect them to carry a valid form of identification!